摘要
陆机的"意称物"、"文逮意",超越了一般的"言意之辩"命题,形成了"物、意、文统一"的逻辑系统,作为反映论的文学观,具有很强的概括力和普适性。不过从现代文艺观及语言哲学观着眼,"物、意、文"之间的联系是极为复杂的,不同的文化形态及文学类别,"物、意、文"之间的关联迥然不同。从遵循"物、意、文"统一,到崇奉精神创造和语言表达的自由空间,关涉到文学疆界的拓展与文学观念的扩版。无论从纵向历史演进还是从横向关联上看,任何文艺观念都有它的不完备性,这正是文学艺术的复杂性、创造性和生命力所在。
The preposition that "meaning refers object" and "word expresses meaning" by the Chinese literary critic Lu Ji goes beyond the ordinary argument of word and meaning. It forms a logical system of the unity of "object, meaning and word". As a literary theory of reflection, it has a strong power of explanation. However, modern literary theories and linguistic philosophy tell us that the relationship between "object, meaning and word" is very complex. The association among these three is very different if the cultural patterns and literary categories are different. From the unity of "object, meaning and word" to the freedom of spiritual creation and linguistic expression, such a change can find reasons in the expansion of literary boundaries and the evolution of literary concepts. Judging from historical evolution or horizontal association, any concept of literature or art is incomplete, which reflects the complexity, creativity and vitality of literature and art.
出处
《江苏海洋大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
2010年第1期45-48,共4页
Journal of Jiangsu Ocean University(Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
基金
江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目(08SJD7500004)
关键词
陆机
物·意·文
言意之辩
反映论
表现论
Lu Ji
object, meaning and word
argument of word and meaning
theory of reflection
theoryof presentation