期刊文献+

慢性活动期溃疡性结肠炎非劣效临床试验设计及其定量评价

Clinical design of a non-inferiority trial and its quantitative evaluation in the patient with mild-to-moderate active ulcerative colitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的介绍慢性活动性轻中度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)非劣效临床试验的试验设计要点。方法根据文献和欧盟关于溃疡性结肠炎新药研究指南,对溃疡性结肠炎非劣性临床研究所涉及到的标准阳性对照、非劣界值、主要疗效指标及剂量选择等关键性问题进行设计;以一个实例进行叙述,并模拟其部分试验数据进行定量评价。结果在活动期的轻中度溃疡性结肠炎的非劣性临床研究中,阳性对照药宜选择氨基水杨酸制,剂量为3g.d-1,非劣界值应取15%,主要疗效指标评判标准采用临床疾病活动指数量表。结论本设计可为同类临床研究提供参考。 Objective To introduce the design of a non - inferiority clinical trial for evaluating the mild -to -moderate active ulcerative coli- tis. Methods Based on international literature and the European guideline on the development of new medicinal products for the treatment of ul- cerative colitis, a clinical trial was designed in involving with the positive control, non - inferiority margin, primary endpoint and the dose - finding within accepted efficacy and safety for a treatment of mild - to - moderate active ulcerative colitis. A real example of ulcerative colitis was introduced and its primary data were simulated for quantitative analysis. Result For the non - inferiority clinical trial on mild - to - moderate active ulcerative colitis, the standard positive control should be aminosalicylic acid (5 -ASA) with the dose of 3 g/day, the non -inferior margin is approximately 15% , and the CAI scale is recommended as primary endpoint. Conclusion This study can provide some important information for similar clinical research.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期209-212,共4页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基金 国家科技支撑计划基金资助项目(2008BAI51B03) 上海市教委基金资助项目(2008GSP19-5 J50303) 上海市高校中医内科学E研究院基金资助项目(E03008)
关键词 溃疡性结肠炎 非劣效设计 非劣效界值 ulcerative colitis non - inferiority design non - inferiority margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Kruis W,Kiudelis G,Racz I,et al.Once daily versus three times daily mesalazine granules in active ulcerative colitis:a double-blind,double-dummy,randomized,non-inferiority trial[J]Cut,2009; 58:233-240.
  • 2Rasdler A,Behrens C,Bias P.Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) micropellets show similar efficacy and tolerability to mesalazine tablets in patients with ulcerative colitis-results from a randomized-controlled trial[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2004; 20:1353-1363.
  • 3Kamm MA,Sandborn W J,Gassul IM,et al.Once-daily,high-concentration MMX mesalamine in active ulcerative colitis[J].Gastroenterology,2007 ; 32:66.
  • 4Higgins PD,Schwartz M,Mapili J,et al.Is endoscopy necessary for the measurement of disease activity in ulcerative colitis?[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2005;100:355-361.
  • 5Langmead L,Feakins RM,Goldthorpe S,et al.Randomized.double-blind,placebo-controlled trial of oral aloe vera gel for active ulcerative colitis[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2004; 19:739-747.
  • 6Eltakim R,Tulassay Z,Kupcinskas L,et al.Clinical trial:randomized-controlled clinical study comparing the efficacy and safety of a low-volume vs.a high-volume mesalazine foam in active distal ulcerative colitis.[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2007 ; 26:1237-1249.
  • 7Forbes A,AL-Damluji A,Ashworth S,et al.Multicentre randomized-controlled clinical trial of Ipocol,a new enteric-coated form of mesalazine,in comparison with Asacol in the treatment of ulcerative colitis[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2005 ; 21:1099-1104.
  • 8Peter F,John D,Elihu H.Adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs:illustrations and practical considerations[J].J Biopharm Star,2006; 16:623-638.
  • 9EMEA.Guideline on the development of new medicinal products for the treatment of ulcerative colitis[EB/OL].http:// www.enma.europa,eu/pdfs/human/ewp/1846306 endraft.pdf.,2006-11-16.
  • 10Menees S,Higgins P,Korsnes S,et al.Does colonoscopy cause increased ulcerative colitis symptoms?[J].Inflamm Bowel Dis,2007 ;13:12-18.

二级参考文献8

  • 1于莉莉,夏结来,蒋红卫.几种简单设计的等效性检验的样本量与检验效能[J].第四军医大学学报,2004,25(11):1045-1049. 被引量:9
  • 2International Conference on Harmonisation.Guidance E9:Statistical principles for clinical trials[J/OL].http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/036396en.pdf,1998-03-01.
  • 3International Conference on Harmonisation.Guidance E10:Choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials[J/OL].http:// www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/036496en.pdf,2000-07 -01.
  • 4EMEA CPMP:Guideline on the choice of the non-inferiority margin[J/OL].Http://www.Emea.Europa.Eu/pdfs/human/ewp/215899en.Pdf,2005 -07 -01.
  • 5Jones B,Jarvis P,Lewis JA,et al.Trials to assess equivalence:the importance of rigorous methods[J].Br Med J,1996 ;313:36-39.
  • 6Campbell MJ,Julious SA,Altman DG.Estimating sample sizes for binary,ordered categorical,and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons[J].Br Med J,1995 ;311:1145-1148.
  • 7EMEA CPMP:Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority[J/OL].Http://www.Emea.Europa.Eu/pdfs/human/ewp/048299en.Pdf,2000-07-01.
  • 8刘玉秀,姚晨,陈峰,陈启光,苏炳华,孙瑞元.非劣效性/等效性试验中的统计学分析[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2000,16(6):448-452. 被引量:32

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部