期刊文献+

多水平模型在生物等效性评价中的应用(Ⅱ) 被引量:1

Application of multilevel models in the evaluation of bioequivalence ( Ⅱ )
原文传递
导出
摘要 探讨多变量多水平模型在生物等效性评价中的应用价值。以4×4交叉试验设计的国产和进口罗格列酮药物生物等效性评价为研究实例,研究多变量多水平模型在同时评价多个指标等效性时方差分量的分解方式,并探讨在多变量多水平框架下评价平均、群体和个体等效性评价的可行性。多变量多水平模型考虑了罗格列酮药物指标In(AUC)和In(Gmax)的相关性,在两个指标出现一个平均等效而另一个平均不等效的矛盾结果时,通过联合检验最终判断两个指标联合具有平均等效性。根据多变量多水平模型方差分量,进一步获得了国产和进口罗格列酮药物具有群体和个体等效性。结论:多变量多水平模型可将多个相关指标纳入同一个模型中,考虑了指标之间的相关性,可改善误差结构,对同时评价多个指标生物等效性提供了统计学方法的发展思路。 The main purpose of this paper is to explore the applicability of multivariate multilevel models for bioequivalence evaluation. Using an example of a 4 × 4 cross-over test design in evaluating bioequivalence of homemade and imported rosiglitazone maleate tablets, this paper illustrated the multivariate-model-based method for partitioning total variances of In (AUC) and In (Cmax) in the framework of multilevel models. It examined the feasibility of multivariate multilevel models in directly evaluating average bioequivalence (ABE) , population bioequivalence (PBE) and individual bioequivalenc (IBE). Taking into account the correlation between In (AUC) and In (Cmax) of rosiglitazone maleate tablets, the proposed models suggested no statistical difference between the two effect measures in their ABE bioequivalence via joint tests, whilst a contradictive conclusion was derived based on univariate multilevel models. Furthermore, the PBE and IBE for both In (AUC) and In (Cmax) of the two types of tablets were assessed with no statistical difference based on estimates of variance components from the proposed models. Multivariate multilevel models could be used to analyze bioequivalence of multiple effect measures simultaneously and they provided a new way of statistical analysis to evaluate bioequivalence.
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期333-339,共7页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
基金 美国纽约中华医学基金会(CMB)项目(00-722)
关键词 多变量多水平模型 生物等效性 4×4交叉试验设计 方差分量 Multivariate multilevel model Bioequivalence 4 × 4 cross-over test design Variance components
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1李高.贝叶斯法评价药物制剂生物等效性的实验及其应用[J].中国医院药学杂志,1997,17(2):53-55. 被引量:5
  • 2Wang WH,Hwang JT,Dasgupt Q.Statistical tests for multivariate bioequivalence.Biometrika,1999,86:395-402.
  • 3闫宇翔,王洪源,王仁安.多临床终点的等效性检验方法探讨[J].中华流行病学杂志,2003,24(10):935-938. 被引量:3
  • 4Guidance for Industry.Statistical approach to establishing bioequivalence.U.S.DHHS,FDA,CDER,2001.
  • 5陈峰,于浩,吕静静,赵杨,刘玉秀.生物等效性评价的统计分析方法[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2004,9(8):949-953. 被引量:16
  • 6刘巧兰,沈卓之,陈峰,李晓松,杨珉.多水平模型在生物等效性评价中的应用(Ⅰ)[J].中华流行病学杂志,2009,30(12):1302-1306. 被引量:3
  • 7Goldstein H.Multilevel statistical models.3rd ed.Arnold.London,2003.
  • 8Griffiths PL,Brown JJ,Smith PW.A comparison of univariate and multivariate multilevel models for repeated measures of use of antenatal care in Uttar Pradesh.J Royal Stat Soc:Series A,2004,167(4):597-611.
  • 9Grilli LD,Rampichini C.Alternative specifications of multivariate multilevel probit ordinal response models.J Educ Behav Stat,2003,28(1):31-44.
  • 10Muller HP,Stadermaon S.Multivariate multilevel models for repeated measures in the study of smoking effects on the association between blaque and gingival bleeding.Clin Oral Investig,2006,10(4):311-317.

二级参考文献21

  • 1陈峰,于浩,吕静静,赵杨,刘玉秀.生物等效性评价的统计分析方法[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2004,9(8):949-953. 被引量:16
  • 2韩可勤,黄圣凯.生物等效性评价中数据对数变换后的一些统计问题[J].中国临床药理学杂志,1994,10(2):124-128. 被引量:35
  • 3韩可勤,黄圣凯.生物等效性评价中常用统计方法的功效与样本容量[J].中国临床药理学杂志,1995,11(2):111-115. 被引量:44
  • 4Guidance for Industry. Statistical approach to establishing bioequivalence. U.S. DHHS, FDA, CDER, 2001.
  • 5Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Individual bioequivalence testing under 2×3 crossover designs. Stat Med, 2002,21 : 629-648.
  • 6Chow SC, Shao J. In vitro bioequivalence testing. Stat Med, 2002,22:55-68.
  • 7Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Statistical tests for population bioequivalence. Stat Sinica, 2003,13 : 539-554.
  • 8Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models. 3rd ed. Arnold London. 2003.
  • 9Hauck WW,Hyslop T, Chen ML, et al. Subject-by-formulation interaction in bioequivalence: conceptual and statistical issues. Pharmaceutical Research,2000,17(4) :375-380.
  • 10Murray DM, Hannanl P J, Wolfinger RD, et al. Analysis of data from group-randomized trials with repeat observations on the same groups. Stat Med, 1998,17:1581-1600.

共引文献21

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部