摘要
为比较Ruiyun式可吸入式套扎器痔上黏膜套扎术(RPH)与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)治疗Ⅲ度脱垂痔的手术效果,将78例Ⅲ度脱垂痔分成R组(RPH)42例和P组(PPH)36例,分别采用RPH和PPH。术后观察7d,并随访1~3个月。比较两组平均手术时间、手术完成后痔核脱垂情况、创口愈合时间、住院时间等结果。结果显示,平均手术时间R组明显优于P组(P〈0.001)。术后肛门坠胀R组明显轻于P组。术后晚期出血R组多于P组。尿潴留、术后脱垂状态两组差异无统计学意义。结果表明,RPH治疗Ⅲ度脱垂痔具有手术时间短、并发症少等优点。
The objective of this study was to understand the efficacy of automatic ligation of superior hemorrhoidal mucosa by using Ruiyun-type ligator (Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids, RPH) and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH) in the treatment of Ⅲ degree prolapsed hemorrhoids. The 78 patients with Ⅲ degree prolapsed hemorrhoids were divided random into two groups, 42 cases of them were R (RPH) group and 36 cases were P (PPH) group,and they receive RPH and PPH respectively. They were observed for 7 days at postoperation, and received the follow-up of 1 month to 3 months at postoperation. Average time of operation,postoperative hemorrhoids prolapse state,time of wound healing,time of hospital stay,and so on were compared between both groups. As results,R group was superior to P group about the average operation time( P 〈0. 001). And there was significant difference about distend tenesmus of anus,R group was less than in the P group. But,about late postoperative bleeding,R group was more than P group. And urine retention,postoperative prolapse state was statistically no difference between them. Results show that RPH possess a short operation time and a fewer complications,etc.
出处
《中国肛肠病杂志》
2010年第3期19-21,共3页
Chinese Journal of Coloproctology