期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

错误正波的神经发生源与功能意义解释 被引量：5

The Neutral Generator and Functional Significance of Error Positivity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 错误正波(error positivity,Pe)是指在错误反应后200～600ms后出现的事件相关电位(ERP)的正偏转,对Pe的研究有助于揭示人类错误加工机制的全貌。现有研究表明Pe主要产生于前扣带回喙部,但不同的研究对其精细神经发生源并没有达成一致。Pe的功能意义解释主要有错误意识假说、行为适应假说、情绪评估假说。当根据有关P3的理论来解释Pe的功能意义时,Pe可能反映了对错误背景的刷新。然而上述每一种对Pe的功能意义的解释都还受到了一些研究结果的质疑和挑战。基于此,作者对现有研究存在的问题进行了总结和分析,并对今后如何对Pe的神经发生源和功能意义的进一步研究提出了建议。 Error positivity（Pe） refers to positive deflection of event-related potentials approximately 200～600 ms after an errant response.Researches in this aspect will help reveal the mechanisms of human error processing.Current evidence shows that Pe mainly arises from the rostral anterior cingulate cortex,but different studies fail to reach a consensus on its precise neutral generator.Hypotheses of functional significance of Pe include error awareness,behaviour adaptation,and emotional assessment.When interpreted in light with P3-related theories,Pe may reflect updating of the error context.However,each of these interpretations have been questioned and challenged by some researchers.In view of this,this paper summarizes and analyzes some problems of the existing studies,and offers some suggestions regarding the neutral generator and functional significance of Pe for further study.
作者 蒋军 陈安涛
机构地区 西南大学心理学院
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期569-577,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(30700226) 中国博士后基金(200902613)资助
关键词 错误正波 错误意识 行为适应 情绪评估 P3 error positivity error awareness behaviour adaptation emotional assessment P3
分类号 B842 [哲学宗教—基础心理学] B845 [哲学宗教—心理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1刘春雷,张庆林.错误加工的神经机制[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(2):341-348. 被引量：23
  • 2Brazdil, M., Roman, R., Daniel, P., & Rektor, I. (2005). Intracerebral error-related negativity in a simple Go/NoGo task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 244-255.
  • 3Brazdil, M., Roman, R., Falkenstein, M., Daniel, P., Jurak, P., & Rektor, I. (2002). Error processing -evidence from intracerebral ERP recordings. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 460-466.
  • 4Davies, P. L., Segalowitz, S. J., Dywan, J., & Pailing, P. E. (2001). Error-negativity and positivity as they relate to other ERP indices of attentional control and stimulus processing. Biological Psychology, 56, 191-206.
  • 5Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., Von Cramon, D., & Engel, A. (2005). Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11730-11737.
  • 6Donchin, E., & Coles, M. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11,355-425.
  • 7Donchin, E., Gratton, G., Dupree, D., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). After a rash action: Latency and amplitude of the P300 following fast guesses. In G. C. Gathercole, M. L. Kietzman & E. Donchin (Eds.), Neurophysiology and psychophysiology: Experimental and clinical applications (pp. 173-188). Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • 8Endrass, T., Reuter, B., & Kathmann, N. (2007). ERP correlates of conscious error recognition: aware and unaware errors in an antisaccade task. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1714- 1720.
  • 9Falkenstein, M. (2004). ERP correlates of erroneous performance. In M. Ullsperger & M. Falkenstein (Eds.), Errors, conflicts, and the brain. Current opinions on performance monitoring (pp. 5-14). Leipzig, Germany: Max Planek Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience.
  • 10Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1990). Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. In C. H. M. Brunia, A. W. K. Gaillard & A. Kok (Eds.), Psychophysiological brain research (Vol. 1, pp. 192-195). Tilburg,The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

二级参考文献46

  • 1Bemstein, P. S., Scheffers, M. K., & Coles, M. G. H. (1995). Where Did I Go Wrong - a Psychophysiologieal Analysis of Error-Detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1312-1322.
  • 2Botvinick, M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
  • 3Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M, Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulated eortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749.
  • 4Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D.(1998) Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749.
  • 5Coles, M. G. H., Schcffers, M. K., & Holroyd, C. B. (2001). Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of errorprocessing. Biological Psychology, 56, 191-206.
  • 6Compton, C. R., Carp, J., Chaddock, L, Fineman, S. L., Quandt, L. C., & Ratliff, J. B (2007). Anxiety and error monitoring: Increased error sensitivity or altered expectations? Brain and Cognition, 64, 247-256.
  • 7Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M. Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K., (2005). Trial-by trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11730-11737.
  • 8Ehlis, A. C., Herrmann, M. L, Bernhard, A., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2005). Monitoring of internal and external error signals. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19(4), 263-269.
  • 9Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1990) Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. In C.H.M. Brunia, A.W.K. GaiUard, & A. Kok (Eds.) Psychophysiological brain research (pp. 192-195). The Netherlands, Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
  • 10Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000). ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial. Biological Psychology, 51, 87-107.

共引文献22

同被引文献93

  • 1岳珍珠,张德玄,王岩.冲突控制的神经机制[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):651-660. 被引量：23
  • 2吴怀安,邓小敏,闫小华,刘铁榜,胡纪泽,沈其杰.儿茶酚氧位甲基转移酶基因多态性与精神分裂症关联分析[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(3):205-207. 被引量：19
  • 3李婷,朱婉儿,姜乾金.心理应激的生物学机制研究进展[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(9):862-864. 被引量：29
  • 4张德玄,周晓林.Delta图分析方法及其在冲突控制研究中的应用[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):545-551. 被引量：6
  • 5Baddeley A. Working memory. Science,1992,255:556 - 559.
  • 6Arias-Vasquez A,Altink ME,Rommelse NNJ,et al. CDH13 is associated with working memory performance in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Genes Brain Behav, 2011,10 : 844-851.
  • 7Baddeley A. Working memory. Curr Biol,2010,20:136- 140.
  • 8Zoudji B ,Thon B,and Debu B. Efficiency of the mnemonic system of expert soccer players under overload of the working memory in a simulated decision-making task. Psychol Sport Exerc, 2010,11 : 18-26.
  • 9Moal ML. Mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic neurons:Func- tional and regulatory roles. In :F.E. Bloom & D.J. Kupfer. (Eds.). Psychopharmacology:The fourth generation of progress. New York,U.A. 1996. 283-294.
  • 10Kunugi H,Nanko S. High and low activity alleles of cate- chol-O -methyltrae gene :ethnic difference and possible association with Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett, 1997,221 : 202-204.

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

心理科学进展
2010年 第4期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部