期刊文献+

决策信心的认知机制与神经基础 被引量:9

Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Decision-making Confidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 决策信心是指在进行判断或决策时,个体对其决策最优性或正确性的信心程度。决策信心的单过程理论认为决策与信心评估是并行的同一加工过程;而决策后理论认为决策和信心评估是串行的两个加工过程。决策信心存在两种典型的偏差效应:过分自信和信心不足。决策信心的神经机制研究指出,信心评估可能是决策过程中最基本并且普遍存在的一个成分;对决策信心评估敏感的脑区包括扣带回、背外侧前额叶和顶上小叶等。未来研究应该在决策信心产生的机制、信心与决策如何交互的心理及神经机制等领域展开大量研究。 Decision-making Confidence is the degree of confidence of the optimization or correctness its decision when one making judgments or decisions.The single-process theories of decision-making confidence suggest decision-making and assessment of confidence is the same parallel process;while the postdecisional theories consider that decision-making and assessment of confidence are two serial different process.The decision-making confidence has two kinds of typical bias effect:overconfidence and lack of confidence.Neural mechanisms of decision-making confidence revealed that the assessment of confidence may be the most basic and pervasive component of decision-making;functional brain areas involved in assessment of confidence include Cingulate gyrus,Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and Superior parietal and so on.Studies in the future should increase researches of the psychological and neural mechanism on the interaction of confidence and decision-making.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期630-638,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(30800292) 211三期工程国家重点学科建设项目(NSKD08007)资助
关键词 决策信心 加工模型 偏差效应 神经机制 decision-making confidence process model bias effect neural mechanisms
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1马廷勇.(2007).一种不确定情境中决策过程的认知与神经机制研究.博士学位论文.西南大学.
  • 2于窈,李纾.“过分自信”的研究及其跨文化差异[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):468-474. 被引量:25
  • 3朱滢.(2005).实验心理学.北京:北京大学出版社.
  • 4Adam, K., Naoshige, U., Hatim, A. Z., & Zachary, F. M. (2008). Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature, 455, 227-230.
  • 5Balakrishnan, J. D., & Ratcliff, R. (1996). Testing models of decision making using confidence ratings in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 615-633.
  • 6Baranski, J. V., & Petrusic, W. M. (1996). A doubt-scaling model of confidence calibration in human judgment. International Journal of Psychology, 31, 186.
  • 7Beaupr6, M. G., Cheung, N., & Hess, U. (2000). The Montreal Set of Facial Displays of Emotion. Montreal: University of Quebec Press.
  • 8Beaupre, M, G,, & Hess, U, (2005), Cross-cultural emotion recognition among Canadian ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 355-370.
  • 9Beaupre, M. G., & Hess, U. (2006). An ingroup advantage for confidence in emotion recognition judgments: the moderating effect of familiarity with the expressions of outgroup members. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 16-26.
  • 10Ben, D. I., Graham, .1. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2007). Managerial Overconfidence and Corporate Policies. Durham: Duke University Press.

二级参考文献39

  • 1李纾 房永青.《新加坡21》对双语青年学生的决策影响[J].(香港)青年研究学报,2002,5(2):162-162.
  • 2Teigen K H,Brun W.Verbal probabilities:A question of frame? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2003,16:53~72
  • 3Koriat A,Lichtenstein S,Fischhoff B.Reasons for confidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory,1980,6:107~118
  • 4Larrick,R P.Motivational factors in decision theories:The role of self-protection.Psychological Bulletin,1993,113:440~450
  • 5Soll J B.Determinants of overconfidence and miscalibration:The roles of random error and ecological structure.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1996,65:117~137
  • 6Soll J B.Determinants of overconfidence and miscalibration:The roles of random error and ecological structure.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1996,65:117~137
  • 7uantak L,Bolger F,Ferrell W R.The hard-easy effect in subjective probability calibration.Organizational Behavior and Human Decisiton Processes,1996,67:201~221
  • 8Juslin P.The overconfidence phenomenon as a consequence of informal experimenter-guided selection of almanac items.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,1994,57:226~246
  • 9Juslin P,Olsson H,Bjorkman M.Brunswikian and Thurstonian origins of bias in probability assessment:on the interpretation of stochastic components of judgment.Journal of Behavior Decision Making,1997
  • 10Buehler R,Griffin D,Ross M.Exploring the ‘planning fallacy’:Why people underestimate their task completion time.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994,67:366~381

共引文献24

同被引文献156

引证文献9

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部