期刊文献+

Advanced landfill leachate treatment using a two-stage UASB-SBR system at low temperature 被引量:26

Advanced landfill leachate treatment using a two-stage UASB-SBR system at low temperature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 A two-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system was introduced to treat landfill leachate for advanced removal of COD and nitrogen at low temperature. In order to improve the total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiency and to reduce the COD requirement for denitrification, the raw leachate with recycled SBR nitrification supematant was pumped into the first-stage UASB (UASB1) to achieve simultaneous denitrification and methanogenesis. The results showed that UASB1 played an important role in COD removal and UASB2 and SBR further enhanced the nutrient removal efficiency. When the organic loading rates of UASB1, UASB2 and SBR were 11.95, 1.63 and 1.29 kg COD/(m^3.day), respectively, the total COD removal efficiency of the whole system reached 96.7%. The SBR acted as the real undertaker for NH4^+-N removal due to aerobic nitrification. The system obtained about 99.7% of NH4^+-N removal efficiency at relatively low temperature (14.9-10.9℃). More than 98.3% TN was removed through complete denitrification in UASB 1 and SBR. In addition, temperature had a significant effect on the rates of nitrification and denitrification rather than the removal of TN and NH4^+-N once the complete nitrification and denitrification were achieved. A two-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system was introduced to treat landfill leachate for advanced removal of COD and nitrogen at low temperature. In order to improve the total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiency and to reduce the COD requirement for denitrification, the raw leachate with recycled SBR nitrification supematant was pumped into the first-stage UASB (UASB1) to achieve simultaneous denitrification and methanogenesis. The results showed that UASB1 played an important role in COD removal and UASB2 and SBR further enhanced the nutrient removal efficiency. When the organic loading rates of UASB1, UASB2 and SBR were 11.95, 1.63 and 1.29 kg COD/(m^3.day), respectively, the total COD removal efficiency of the whole system reached 96.7%. The SBR acted as the real undertaker for NH4^+-N removal due to aerobic nitrification. The system obtained about 99.7% of NH4^+-N removal efficiency at relatively low temperature (14.9-10.9℃). More than 98.3% TN was removed through complete denitrification in UASB 1 and SBR. In addition, temperature had a significant effect on the rates of nitrification and denitrification rather than the removal of TN and NH4^+-N once the complete nitrification and denitrification were achieved.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2010年第4期481-485,共5页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.50978003) the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No.8091001) the Funding Project for Academic Human Resources Development in Institutions of Higher Learning Under the Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality (No.PHR20090502) the State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (No.QAK200802)
关键词 landfill leachate two-stage UASB-SBR advanced nitrogen removal low temperature NITRIFICATION DENITRIFICATION landfill leachate two-stage UASB-SBR advanced nitrogen removal low temperature nitrification denitrification
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Agdag O N, Sponza D T, 2005. Aanaerobic/aerobic treatment of municipal landfill leachate in sequential two-stage upflow sludge blanket reactor(UASB)/completely stirred tank reactor (CSTR) system. Process Biochemistry, 40(2): 895- 902.
  • 2Ahn D H, Yun-Chul C, Won-Seok, 2002a. Use of coagulant and zeolite to enhance biological treatment efficiency of high ammonia leachate. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 37(2): 163-173.
  • 3Ahn W Y, Kang, M S, Yim S K, Choi K H, 2002b. Advanced landfill leachate treatment using an integrated MBR process. Desalination, 149(2): 109-114.
  • 4APHA, 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (19th ed.). Washington DC, USA.
  • 5Bdaszczyk M, Mycielski R, Deptuch H J, Brzostek K, 1980. Effect of various sources of organic carbon and high nitrite and nitrateconcentrations on the selection of denitrifying bacteria. Ⅰ. Stationary cultures. Acta Microbiologica polonica, 29(4): 397-406.
  • 6Betlach M R, Tiedje J M, 1981. Kinetic explanation for accumulation of nitrite, nitric oxide and nitrous oxide during bacterial denitrification. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 42(6): 1074-1084.
  • 7Chen S, Sun D Z, Chung J S, 2007. Simultaneous removal of COD and ammonium from landfill leachate using anaerobic-aerobic moving-bed biofilm reactor system. Waste Management, 28(2): 339-346.
  • 8Chiang L C, Chang J E, Chung C T, 2001. Electrochemical oxidation combined with physical-chemical pretreatment processes for the treatment of refractory landfill leachate. Environmental Engineering Science, 18(6): 363-379.
  • 9Dawson R N, Murphy K L, 1972. The temperature dependency of biological denitirification. Water Research, 6(1 ): 71-83.
  • 10Haapea P, Korhonen S, Tuhkanen T, 2002. Treatment of industrial landfill leachate by chemical and biological methods: Ozonation, ozonation+hydrogen peroxide, hydrogen peroxide and biological post-treatment for ozonated water. Ozone Science & Engineering, 24(5): 369-378.

同被引文献240

引证文献26

二级引证文献236

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部