期刊文献+

Web 2.0环境下用户生成视频内容质量测评框架研究 被引量:25

A Conceptual Evaluation Framework on Information Quality about User-Generated Video Content in Web 2.0 Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近几年随着Web2.0理念与相关技术的发展,视频类用户生成内容数量激增,影响日增,然而其整体的质量问题却有待改善。目前关于Web2.0环境下视频类用户生成内容质量测评的研究还不多见。本文在相关研究综述和现状考察的基础上,基于学术和实用的视角,提出一套多层次、多维度、多方法的质量测评框架,并就该领域今后的研究工作及亟待突破的核心问题进行了展望。 Recently, with the development of the concept and related technologies about Web 2.0, user - generated video content has been undergoing a vast increasing in amount and a promising development. However, the overall information quality about user-generated video content is still suspending and needs further studying, which are lack of theoretical and empirical researches so far. Based on the literature review and field study about its status quo, this paper aims to put forward a conceptual evaluation t~'amework on information quality about user - generated video content with multi- level, multi -dimension, and multi -methodologies, which are drawn from both the academic and practical perspective. In the end, discusses some core issues which deserve further attention.
出处 《图书馆杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期51-57,共7页 Library Journal
关键词 视频类用户生成内容 信息质量 测评框架 WEB 2.0 User - generated video content, Information quality, Evaluation framework, Web 2.0
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1第23次中国互联网发展状况统计报告.[2009-02-12].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/uploadfiles/pdf/2009/1/13/92458.rdf.
  • 2Wang R Y, Strong D M. Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. Journal of Management Information System, 1996, 12(4):5-30.
  • 3Besiki Stvilia, Les Gasser, Michael B. Twidale, Linda C. Smith. A Framework for Information Quality Assessment I. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(12):1720- 1733.
  • 4Matthew Wamsley Bovee. Information Quality: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation. The University of Kansas (USA), 2004.
  • 5Ballou D P, Pazer H L. Modeling Completeness versus Consistency Tradeoffs in Information Decision Contexts. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2003, 15( 1 ) : 240 -243.
  • 6曹孟谊,吴建明,孟秀玲.国外信息质量评估指标体系研究[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2004,18(4):55-58. 被引量:16
  • 7高智勇,高建民,王侃昌,陈富民,刘军强.基于信息结构要素的信息质量定义与内涵分析[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(10):1724-1728. 被引量:19
  • 8马小闳,龚国伟.信息质量评估研究[J].情报杂志,2006,25(5):19-21. 被引量:22
  • 9苏颖,杨磊,金占明.企业信息化过程中的信息质量保障机制研究初探.第二届中国管理学年会会议论文集.南京.2007,11.
  • 10Enrique Herrera - Viedma, Gabriella Pasi, Antonio G. Lopez - Herrera , Carlos Porcel. Evaluating the Information Quality of Websites : A Methodology Based on Fuzzy Computing with Words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(4 ) :538 -549.

二级参考文献19

  • 1曹孟谊,吴建明,孟秀玲.国外信息质量评估指标体系研究[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2004,18(4):55-58. 被引量:16
  • 2高智勇,高建民,陈富民.数字化制造中的信息质量问题研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(7):981-985. 被引量:15
  • 3刘树林,邱菀华,张瑞清.再论AHP中的指数标度法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1995,15(10):78-80. 被引量:25
  • 4Martin J Eppler,Dǒrte Wittig.Conceptualizing Information Quality:A Review of Information Quality Frameworks from the Last Ten Years.Proceeding of the 2000 Conference on Information Quality,2000.
  • 5Lesca H,Lesca E.Gestion de Information,Qualité de Information et Performances de Iéntreprise
  • 6Redman T C.Date Quality for the Information Age.Boston,MA:artech house,1996.
  • 7Wang R y,Strong D M.Beyond Accuracy:What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers.Journal of Management Information Systems,1996, 12 (4)
  • 8Russ-Mohl S.Der I-Faktor.Osnabrück:Fromm,1994
  • 9Kōniger P,Reithmayer W.Management Unstrukturierter Information.Frankfurt,1998
  • 10English L.Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality.Wiley & Sons:New York,1999

共引文献49

同被引文献494

引证文献25

二级引证文献583

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部