期刊文献+

杀菌性/通透性增加蛋白模拟肽小鼠体内拮抗内毒素作用的研究 被引量:10

Studies on the anti endotoxin activity of modeling peptides of bactericidal/permeability increasing protein in vivo
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察杀菌性/通透性增加蛋白(BPI)模拟肽对内毒素(LPS)攻击所致小鼠死亡的保护作用。方法:以一个LD50的LPS(20mg·kg-1)静脉注射攻击小鼠,分别于LPS攻击后20s内静脉注射不同剂量的BPI模拟肽;于LPS攻击前及攻击后不同时间内分别静脉注射5mg·kg-1和10mg·kg-1的BPI模拟肽,以观察BPI模拟肽对LPS攻击所致小鼠死亡的保护作用、BPI模拟肽对LPS攻击小鼠死亡保护作用的时效关系及BPI模拟肽对LPS攻击小鼠死亡的预防作用。结果:BPI模拟肽对LPS所致小鼠死亡有明显的保护作用及预防作用,并有一定的量效关系及时效关系。结论:BPI模拟肽,不仅保留了BPI特异性中和LPS的特性。 Objective: To observe the protective effects of BPI modeling peptides on LPS challenged mice. Methods: One LD 50 dose of LPS was injected to challenge mice, and different dose of BPI modeling peptides was injected within 20 s after the challenging and then 5 mg·kg -1 /10 mg·kg -1 dose of BPI modeling peptides was injected pre/post the challenging respectively, to observe the protective or preventive effects of BPI modeling peptides on the LPS challenged mice. Results: It was found that BPI modeling peptides had a significant protective effect on endotoxin (20 mg/kg) challenged mice and when the peptides administered with LPS at the same time or after that of LPS within 10 s, it had a significant protective effects, and when administered 30 min after that of LPS, it had no significant protective effect; when administered 60 min to 10 s before LPS challenging, it still had a significant protective effect. Conclusion: BPI modeling peptides seems had a much longer half life time and the protective effect on LPS challenged mice could be better than that of BPI.
出处 《第三军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1998年第6期520-523,共4页 Journal of Third Military Medical University
基金 重庆市科委院士基金 军队卫生医药基金
关键词 杀菌性 通透性 内毒素血症 多肽 BPI BPI modeling peptide
  • 相关文献

同被引文献45

  • 1陈基岱,景炳文,李萍,王笑利,侯健,丁可萱,周彬,王越波,丛燕萍.多系统脏器衰竭和败血症患者肿瘤坏死因子和白细胞介素6的水平和意义[J].中国危重病急救医学,1993,5(6):325-327. 被引量:12
  • 2程玉磊,祁克宗,潘玲,周秀红.杀菌性/通透性增加蛋白的生物学功能及其应用[J].动物医学进展,2005,26(3):16-18. 被引量:4
  • 3奥斯特F 颜子颖 等.精编分子生物学实验指南[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.274-288.
  • 4段文卓 宫海民.内毒素导致休克的作用机制探讨[J].中国病理生理杂志,1997,13(2):220-220.
  • 5O'Reilly M, Newcomb DE, Remick D, et al. Endotoxin, sepsis, and the primrose path. Shock, 1999, 12: 411-420.
  • 6Tsujikawa A, Kiryu J, Yamashiro K, et al. Interactions between blood cells and retinal endothelium in endotoxic sepsis. Hypertension, 2000, 36: 250-258.
  • 7Beamer LJ, Carroll SF, Eisenberg D, et al. The three-dimensional structure of human bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein: implications for understanding protein- lipopolysaccharide interactions. Biochem Pharmacol, 1999, 5: 225-229.
  • 8Yamaguchi H, Ishii E, Tashiro K, et al. Role of umbilical vein endothelial cells in hematopoiesis. Leuk Lymphoma, 1998, 31: 61-69.
  • 9Lorenzon P, Vecile E, Nardon E, et al. Endothelial cell E- and P-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 function as signaling receptors. J Cell Biol, 1998, 142:1381-1391.
  • 10Arditi M, Zhou Jin, Huang SH, et al. Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein protects vascular endothelial cells from lipopolysaccharide-induced activation and injury. Infect Immun, 1994, 62: 3930-3936.

引证文献10

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部