期刊文献+

暴力危险性评估-20对精神分裂症暴力危险性评估的信效度研究 被引量:4

Study of the Reliability and Validity of HCR-20 for Assessing Violent Risk of Patients with Schizophrenia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】初步探讨暴力危险性评估(HCR-20)评估精神分裂症患者暴力危险性的信效度。【方法】分别对30对有/无攻击行为的男性精神分裂症患者(攻击组/非攻击组)的简明精神病量表(BPRS)总分和各因子分、外显攻击行为量表(MOAS)总分和各因子分、Baratt冲动量表(BIS-11)总分进行测量,并对MOAS阳性组与阴性组的HCR-20总分和因子分进行比较和分析。【结果】攻击组HCR-20总分和各因子分均高于非攻击组,差异均有显著性(P〈0.01)。HCR-20与BIS-II的相关系数为0.664,与MOAS的相关系数为0.843。MOAS阳性组HCR-20总分,H因子分、C因子分、R因子分都高于阴性组,差异有显著性(P〈0.01)。BIS-11阳性组HCR-20总分,H因子分、C因子分、R因子分都高于阴性组,差异有显著性(P〈0.01)。【结论】HCR-20具有较好的信度和效度,可望用于精神分裂症患者暴力危险性评估。 [Objective] To explore the reliability and validity of HCR-20 for assessing the violent risk of patients with schizophrenia. [Methods] The total scores of BPRS, MOAS, BIS-11, HCR-20 and the subscale scores of BPRS, MOAS, HCR-20 were Used to assess the 30 pairs of schizophrenic patients with and without aggression. The reliability and validity of HCR-20 were investigated. [Results] The aggression, MOAS property aggression, auto-aggression, physical aggression subscale scores, BIS-11 total score, HCR-20 total scores and subscale scores of the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group. The correla- tion coefficient of HCR-20 and BIS-11 was 0. 664. The correlation coefficient of HCR-20 and MOAS was 0. 843. HCR-20 total scores and subscale scores of MOAS of positive group were significantly higher than those of the negative group. HCR-20 total scores and subscale scores of BIS-11 positive group were significantly higher than those of the negative group. [Conclusion]The reliability and validity of HCR-20 are high. HCR- 20 can be used to evaluate the violent risk of schizophrenic patients.
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2010年第3期405-408,共4页 Journal of Clinical Research
基金 中南大学“国家大学生创新性实验计划”项目(YB08102)
关键词 精神分裂症 暴力 schizophrenia violence
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Monahan J.Major mental disorders and violence to others[J].Handbook of antisocial behavior,1997,12(44):92-100.
  • 2张明园.精神科评定量表手册[M].第2版,2007:81-94.
  • 3Barbara E,McDermott,John F,Edens,Cameron D,et al.Scott Examining the role of static and dynamic risk factors in the prediction of inpatient violence[J].Law Hum Behav,2008,4(32):325-338.
  • 4Barbara E,McDermott,John F,Edens,Cameron D.Examining the role of static and dynamic risk factors in the prediction of inpatient of violence[J].Law Hum Behav,2008,9(32):325-338.
  • 5王小平,杨德森,李凌江,高北陵.男性分裂症患者和罪犯攻击行为相关因素对照研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1997,11(2):103-106. 被引量:14
  • 6Loretta J,Stalans,Paul R,Yarnold,Magnus Seng,et al.Identifying three types of violent offenders and predicting violent recidivism while on probation[J].Law and Hunan Behavior,2004,9(33):111-114.
  • 7Kevin S,Douglas,James RP.The impact of confidence on the accuracy of structured professional and actuarial violence risk judgments in a sample of forensic psychiatric patients[J].Law and Human Behavior,2003,12(6):25-32.
  • 8Cheung P,Schweitzern I,Crowley K,et al.Aggression behavior in schizophrenia[J].Psychitry Research,1997,11(72):41-50.
  • 9Yudofsky SC,Sliver JM,Jackson W,et al.The Overt Aggression Scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression[J].Am J Psychiatry,1986,10(143):35-39.
  • 10Buss A,Durkee A.An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility[J].Journal of Consulting Psychology,1957,4(21):343-349.

二级参考文献1

  • 1汪向东,中国心理卫生杂志,1993年,7卷,增刊,42页

共引文献78

同被引文献75

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部