组织创新气氛对员工创新行为的影响过程研究——基于心理授权的中介效应分析被引量：73

Does Psychological Empowerment Mediate the Relationship between Organizational Innovative Climate and Employee Innovative Behavior?

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文首先从实践问题与理论发展的角度,指出了本文的研究背景与动机;然后在文献综述的基础上对研究变量进行界定,探讨变量间的假设关系;接下来,本文发展了研究所用的测量工具,并对测量进行了信度和效度检验;最后对变量间的关系进行实证检验。研究结论表明,教育程度、年龄、任职年限、职务级别等人口学变量与心理授权显著相关,这些人口学变量也与创新行为显著相关。中介效应研究结论表明,心理授权在主管支持与创新行为间起完全中介作用;心理授权在组织支持与创新行为间起部分中介作用;心理授权在同事支持与创新行为间起部分中介作用。 Firstly, from theory and practice, the research motivation and research meaning are put forward. Then based on the research review, we define the research variables and discuss the relationship among these variables. Then we develop the measuring instrument and check their reliability and validity. At last, we test the mediated effect of psychological empowerment between organizational innovative climate and innovative behavior. The research of demographic variable finds that education, age, tenure, rank et al. have strong relationship with employee psychological empowerment, these demographic variables also have strong relationship with innovative behavior. This paper analyzes the mediation effect of psychological empowerment between organizational climate and innovative behavior, the result is that psychological empowerment completely mediates the relationship between supervisor support and innovative behavior, psychological empowerment partly mediates the relationship between organizational support and innovative behavior, psychological empowerment partly mediates the relationship between team support and innovative behavior.

作者刘云石金涛

机构地区上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院

出处《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期133-144,共12页 China Soft Science

基金国家自然科学基金项目(70672072)

关键词组织创新气氛心理授权员工创新行为 organizational innovative climate psychological empowerment employee innovative behavior

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献30

1Ekavll G.Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation[J].European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,1996,5:105-123.
2Neil R Anderson,Michael A West.Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation:Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,1998,19:235-258.
3Amabile T M,Conti R,Coon H,Lazenby J,Herron M.Assessing the Work Enviornment for Creativity[J].Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(5):1154-1184.
4Isaksen S G,Laner K J,Ekvall G.Situational Outlook Questionnaire:A Measure of the Climate for Creativity and Change[J].Psychological Reports,1999,85:665-674.
5Amabile T M.Motivating Creativity in Organizations[J].California Management Review,1997,40(1):22-26.
6Scott S G,Bruce R A.Determinants of Innovative Behavior:A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Work Place[J].Academy of Management Journal,1994,37:580-607.
7Onne Janssen.Job Demands,Perceptions of Effort-reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behavior[J].Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2000,73:287 -302.
8Spreitzer,Gretchen M.Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace:Dimensions,Measurement,and Validation[J].Academy of Management Journal,1995,38 (5):1442-1466.
9Deci E L,Ryan R M.Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior[M].New York:Plenum,1985.
10Hackman J R,et al.Effects of Changes in Job Characteristics on Work Attitudes and Behaviors:A Naturally Occurring Quasi-experiment[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,1978,21:289-304.

二级参考文献19

1龙立荣,方俐洛,凌文辁.企业员工自我职业生涯管理的结构及关系[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):183-191. 被引量：94
2Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Lee J Y et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879～903
3Livingstone L P, Nelson D L, Barr S H. Person-environment fit and creativity: an examination of supply-value and demand-ability version of fit. Journal of Management, 1997, 23(2): 119～146
4Eby L T, Dobbins G H. Collectivistic orientation in teams: an individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior,1997, 18:275～295
5Harris S G, Mossholder K W. The affective implications of perceived congruence with culture dimensions during organizational transformation. Journal of Management, 1996, 22(4): 527～547
6Burke M J, Brief A P, George J M. The role of negative affectivity in understanding relations between self-reports of stressors and strains: A comment on the applied psychology literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78:402～412
7Olkin I, Finn J D. Correlation redux. Psychological Bulletin, 1995, 118:155～164
8Williams L J, Gavin M B, Williams M L. Measurement and nonmeasurement processes with negative affectivity and employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, 81: 88～101
9Lindell M K, Brandt C J. Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85:331～348
10Lindell M K, Whitney D J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional designs. Journal of Applied Psychology,2001, 86:114～121