期刊文献+

中国英语学习者歧义词心理表征的发展模式 被引量:17

The representation of ambiguous words in Chinese EFL learners’ mental lexicon: A developmental model
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文使用实验方法,探讨了中国英语学习者同形歧义词、隐喻多义词和转喻多义词的心理表征方式。结果发现,中国英语学习者歧义词的心理表征是一个发展的模式:同形歧义词和转喻多义词的心理表征随学习者英语水平的提高而更具分立性;但在转喻多义这个维度上,词义之间的联系强度不是随着语言水平的提高而减弱,而是相反。本文认为,这个表征模式体现了基于用法理论的语言学习观。 This paper reports on an experiment exploring Chinese EFL learners’ mental representation of three types of ambiguous words: homonymy, metaphoric polysemy and metonymic polysemy. The results show that the representation of the three types of ambiguous words in Chinese EFL learners’ mental lexicon is a developmental model: the sense relatedness of homonymy and metaphoric polysemy becomes ever lower as the learners’ language proficiency improves. On the contrary, the sense relatedness of metonymic polysemy is ever higher when the learners achieve a higher proficiency. The model is consistent with the usage-based approach for second language learning.
作者 赵晨
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期55-63,共9页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(项目号07JJD740067) 广东省211三期重点学科建设子项目(项目号:GDUFS211-1-063) 广东外语外贸大学校级人文社科重点研究基地项目(项目号:399-X3908015)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Apresjan, J. 1974. Regular polysemy [J]. Linguistics 142: 5-32.
  • 2Beauvillain, C. & J. Grainger. 1987. Accessing interlexical homographs: Some limitations of a language-selective access [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 26: 658-672.
  • 3Brisard, F. B., G. V. Rillaer & D. Sandra. 2001. Processing polysemous, homonymous, and vague adjectives [A]. In H. Cyuckens & B. E. Zawada (eds.). Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics; Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference [C]. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
  • 4Croft, W. 1998. Linguistic evidence and mental representations [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 2: 151-173.
  • 5Deignan, A. 2001. Meataphor[M]. Harper Collins Publisher.
  • 6Frisson, S. & M. J. Picketing. 2001. Obtaining a figurative interpretation of a word: Support for underspecification [ J ]. Metaphor and Symbol 16: 3-4, 14,9-171.
  • 7Grainger, J. & T. Dijkstra. 1992. On the representation and use of language information in bilinguals [A]. In R. Harris (ed.). Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals [C]. Amsterdarm: North-Holland.
  • 8Jorgensen, J. C. 1990. The psychological reality of word senses [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19, 3: 167-190.
  • 9Klein, D. E. & G. L. Murphy. 2001. The representation of polysemous words [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 45 : 259-282.
  • 10Klepousniotou, E. 2002. The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon [J]. Brain and Language 81: 205-223.

二级参考文献36

  • 1Polysemy and homonymy are relative concepts. (Apresjan,1974: 13)One man's homonym is another man's polysem.( Lyons, 1977 ).
  • 2Apresjan, J.D. 1974. Regular polysemy [J]. Linguistics 142:5-32.
  • 3Azuma, T. & van Orden. 1997. Why safe is better than fast: The relatedness of a word's meanings affects lexical decision times [J], Journal of Memory and Language 36: 484-540.
  • 4Barsalou, L. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals [A]. In G. H. Bower (ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation : Advances in Research and Theory [C]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • 5Borowsky, R. & M. E. J. Masson. 1996. Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 22: 63-85.
  • 6Brisard, F. , G. van Rillaer & S. Dominiek. 2001. Processing polysemous, homonymous, and vague adjectives [A]. In H. Cuyckens & B. Zawada (eds.). Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics [ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 7Caramazza, A. & E. Grober. 1976. Polysemy and the structure of the subjective lexicon [ A]. In C. Rameh ( ed. ). Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics. Semantics: Theory and Application [C]. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press. Carroll 9, 1971).
  • 8Carroll, J.B., Davies, P. & B. Richman. 1971. Word Frequency Book [ M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
  • 9Cruse. D.A. 1986. Lexical Semantics [ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Cruse. D.A. 2000. Aspects of the micro-structure of word meanings [A]. In Y. Ravin & C. Leacock (eds.). Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

共引文献29

同被引文献248

引证文献17

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部