国际制度变迁与东亚体系和平转型——一种制度主义视角分析被引量：17

Institutional Change in International System and the Peaceful Transition in East Asia:An Institutional Perspective

导出

摘要受新制度经济学关于制度变迁的学理启发,作者提出了国际制度变迁的理论分析范式,并以此探讨国际制度变迁如何影响东亚体系的和平转型。未来和平转型后的东亚体系将呈现一种"嵌套交叠式"制度联系模式,在这种模式中,东亚多边合作体系与美国双边同盟体系互相交叠、兼容共存。多边合作体系既不能化解美国双边同盟体系,美国双边同盟体系也不能主导多边合作体系。在这种情况下,中国外交的现实做法是从兼容美国双边同盟体系的这一路径出发,在东亚地区积极开展多边外交、推动建立多边合作体系。 Based on the theory of institutional change in new institutional economics,the author proposed a theoretical paradigm to explain the impacts of institutional changes in international system on the peaceful transition in East Asia.The East Asian system will be a 'nested overlapping institutional model' after its peaceful transition,under which the bilateral alliance system dominated by the US coexists with the multilateral cooperation system in East Asia.Thus,China should actively advance multilateral diplomacy and promote the establishment of multilateral cooperation system while accommodating the bilateral alliances of the US in East Asia.

作者祁怀高

机构地区复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院

出处《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期54-68,共15页 World Economics and Politics

基金中国博士后科学基金资助项目<兼容美国同盟体系:冷战后中国多边外交与东亚体系的转型>(资助编号:20080440592)的资助

关键词国际制度变迁东亚体系转型中国美国 institutional change,transition in East Asia,China,the United States

分类号 D731 [政治法律—中外政治制度]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献37

1David Shambaugh, ed., Prover Shift: China and Asia's New Dynamics, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.
2Zhiqun Zhu, US-China Relations in the 21st Century: Power Transition and Peace, New York: Routledge, 2006.
3Steve Chan, China, the U. S. , and the Power-Transition Theory: A Critique, London and New York: Routledge, 2008.
4Melissa Cudey and Nicholas Thomas, eds., Advancing East Asian Regionalism, New York: Routledge, 2006.
5Seng Tan and Amitav Acharya, eds., Asia-Pacific Security Cooperation: National Interests and Regional Order, New York and London: M. E. Sharpe, 2004.
6Zhiqun Zhu, War and Peace between Great Powers: Power Transition in Historical Perspective, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of South Carolina, 2003, pp. 163-238.
7Charles A. Kupchan, et al., Power in Transition: The Peaceful Change of International Order, Tokyo: UN University Press, 2001, pp. 11-12.
8崔立如.《东北亚地区安全政策及安全合作构想》,北京:时事出版社,2006.
9Andrew Huh'ell, "Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective," in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds., Regionalism in World Politics: Regionl Organization and Intenzational Order, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995, p.45.
10李增刚.国际规则变迁与实施机制的经济学分析[J].制度经济学研究,2005(4):189-210. 被引量：10

二级参考文献14

1(德)埃瑞克·G.菲吕博顿(EirikG.Furubotn),(德)鲁道夫·瑞切特(RudolfRichter)编,孙经纬.新制度经济学[M]上海财经大学出版社,1998.
2James M. Buchanan. The domain of constitutional economics[J] 1990,Constitutional Political Economy(1):1～18
3Oran R Young,,W.Bradnee Chambers,,Joy A.Kim,Claudia ten Have.Institutional interplay:biosafety and trade[]..2008
4Oran R Young.The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change:Fit,Interplay,and Scale[]..2002
5Oran R Young."Vertical Interplay among Scale-dependent Environmental and Resource Regimes,"[].Ecology and Society.2006
6Leslie A.King.‘‘Institutional Interplay:Research Questions,"[]..
7Olav Schram Stokke.Governing High Seas Fisheries:The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes[]..2001
8Olav Schram Stokke."The Interplay of International Regimes:Putting Effectiveness Theory to Work,"[].FNI Report.2001
9Sebastian Oberthür,Thomas Gehring.Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance:Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies[]..2006
10Sebastian Oberthür,Thomas Gehring."Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance:The Case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization,"[].Global Environmental Politics.2006