期刊文献+

基于对数应力率大应变本构关系的参数标定研究

Calibration of Parameters in Large Strain Constitutive Model with Logarithmic Stress Rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在所有率型弹塑性本构模型中,只有对数应力率对应的本构模型能够满足自适应准则。基于对数应力率,采用实心圆轴扭转实验,对大应变弹塑性本构模型中的参数标定问题进行了讨论。推导出了考虑Swift效应时端部自由实心圆轴扭转变形的变形率、对数旋率、Kirchhoff应力及Kirchhoff应力的对数应力率。对于等向强化大应变弹塑性本构关系,给出了由实心圆轴扭转实验标定的、基于Kirchhoff应力对数应力率的本构关系中塑性刚度函数的表达式。分析了扭转圆轴的Swift效应对塑性刚度函数的影响。结果表明,实心圆轴扭转的轴向伸长变形和径向变形对基于对数应力率大应变本构关系中的塑性刚度函数都有影响。当不考虑Swift效应时,所得塑性刚度函数表达式与不考虑Swift效应时基于Jaumann应力率的塑性刚度函数表达式相同。 Among all rate type elastoplastic constitutive models, only those with the newly discovered logarithmic stress rate fulfill self consistency criterion. Solid shafts torsion test was used to determine large deformation elasto-plastic behavior because of the plastic stability of the solid torsion specimen. An isotropic hardening elasto-plastic constitutive model with the logarithmic stress rate was studied by the aid of solid cylindrical shafts torsion test within large strain range. The deformation rate, the logarithmic spin, the Kirchhoff stress and the logarithmic stress rate of Kirchhoff stress were obtained in torsion of free-end solid shafts when considering Swift effect. According to the results obtained from solid cylindrical torsion test, the plastic rigidity function in the isotropic hardening elasto-plastic constitutive model was determined within large strain range. The constitutive model was compared with the constitutive models with Jaumann stress rates. The results show that the Swift effect on finite strain constitutive relationship is related to the varying rate of axial deformation and radius deformation to shear strain.
出处 《力学季刊》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期71-75,共5页 Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics
基金 哈尔滨工程大学基础研究基金资助项目
关键词 弹塑性本构关系 对数应力率 大应变 实心圆轴扭转实验 Swift效应 elasto-plastic constitutive model logarithmic stress rate large strain solid shafts torsion test Swift effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1何蕴增,邹广平.实心圆试件扭转试验确定大应变本构关系[J].力学学报,2001,33(6):828-833. 被引量:15
  • 2杨丽红,何蕴增,吴国辉,邹广平.基于扭转试验的大变形本构关系分析[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2006,27(6):816-820. 被引量:9
  • 3赵慧娟,庄茁,郑泉水.大变形扭转塑性硬化的实验和仿真研究[J].力学学报,2002,34(5):804-811. 被引量:19
  • 4Xiao H,Bruhus O T,MeyersA.Large strain responses of elastic-perfect plasticity and kinematics hardening plasticity with the logarithmic rate:Swift effect in torsionFJ].International Journal of Plasticity,2001,17:211-235.
  • 5Swift H W.Length changes in metals under torsional overstrain[J].Engineering,1947,163:253-257.
  • 6Wu H C,Xu Z Y,Wang P T.Torsion test of aluminum in the large strain range[J].Int J Plasticity,1997,13(10):873-892.
  • 7王志乔,金明.大变形扭转剪应变定义的误差分析[J].北京交通大学学报,2005,29(4):10-12. 被引量:5
  • 8Nagtegaal J C,de Jong J E.On the implementation of inelastic constitutive equations with special reference to large deformation prob-lems.Meths[J].Appl Mech Engrg,1982,33:469-484.
  • 9Xiao H,Bruhns O T,Meyers A.Logarithmic strain,logarithmic spin and logarithmic rate[J].Acta Mech,1997,124:89-105.
  • 10Hutchinson J W.Numerical strain analysis of elastic plastic solids and structure[J].ASME,1973,6:17-29.

二级参考文献26

  • 1何蕴增,邹广平,潘信吉,张正国.扭转冷作硬化的试验研究及分析[J].实验力学,1994,9(3):262-269. 被引量:23
  • 2山田嘉昭(日) 钱仁耕等(译).非线性有限元基础[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1988.36-38.
  • 3黄克智.塑性本构理论(教材)[M].北京:清华大学,1987..
  • 4何蕴增 潘信吉.一种通过扭转试验研究塑性材料真实应力应变关系的方法[J].舰工科技,1987,(4):40-47.
  • 5钱仁耕(译),非线形有限元基础,1988年,36页
  • 6何蕴增,船工科技,1987年,4期,40页
  • 7黄克智,塑性本构理论,1987年
  • 8何蕴增 潘信吉.一种通过扭转实验确定塑性材料真实应力应变关系的方法[J].船工科技,1987,(4):40-47.
  • 9Wu PD, Van der Giessen E. Delft. Analysis of elastic-plastic torsion of circular bars at large strains. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 1991, 61:89~103
  • 10ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual 6.2, HKS. INC. USA, 2001

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部