期刊文献+

预后指数在外周 T细胞淋巴瘤-非特指型预后判断中的应用价值 被引量:1

Prognostic Significance of PIT in Unspecified Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价外周T细胞淋巴瘤-非特指型(PTCL-U)预后指数(PIT)在PTCL-U预后判断中的价值。方法分析2005年5月—2008年5月间61例经免疫组化方法复检确诊的PTCL-U患者的临床资料,按PIT的预后不良因素个数将61例患者分成4组,分析各组患者对治疗的反应及其预后的差异。结果预后不良因素等级与首程化疗的疗效有关(χ2=8.154,P=0.043),4组总的生存率经Log-rank检验差异显著(P=0.0498)。4组的中位生存时间(MST)分别为:36+、16.61、13.16、11.98个月。4组的1年总生存(OS)分别为85.66%、68.44%、44.62%、33.25%;2年OS分别为53.75%、39.11%、29.75%、16.62%。影响预后的不良因素多因素分析结果表明,PIT评分(P=0.043)可以作为PTCL-U的独立预后因素,而PIT中单一指标尚不能作为独立的预后因素。结论PIT能够在一定程度上预测PTCL-U对治疗的反应性和预后。 Objective To evaluate the Prognostic significance of prognostic index (PIT) for peripheral T - cell lymphoma -unspecified (PTCL-U) in judgment of PTCL-U prognosis. Methods The data of 61 PTCL-U patients, diagnosed by immunohistochemistry re - examination from May 2005 to May 2008, were divided into 4 groups according to numbers of poor prognostic factors to analyze the difference of response to treatment and prognosis. Results Poor prognostic factors were related to the effect of first treatment (X^2 = 8. 154, P = 0. 043 ) , and there was significant difference in overall survival detected by Log Rank between4 groups (P = 0.0498). The median survival time (MST) of 4 groups was 36^+ , 16.61, 13.16, 11.98 months, respectively. The 1 - year overall survivals (OS) were 85.66% , 68.44% , 44. 62% , 33.25% , respectively, and 2 - year were 53.75%, 39. 11%, 29. 75%, 16.62%, respectively. Multivariate survival analysis showed that PIT scores (P = 0. 043 ) could be used as independent prognostic factors, but a single index of PIT could not be used as a prognostic factor. Conclusion PIT can predict the response of PTCL - C to treatment and its prognosis.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期1216-1218,共3页 Chinese General Practice
基金 河北省唐山市科委项目(06134601A-7)
关键词 预后指数 外周T细胞淋巴瘤-非特指型 预后 Prognostic index T - cell lymphoma - unspecified Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Rodriguez-Abreu D,Filho VB,Zucca E.Peripheral T-cell lymphomas,unspecified(or not otherwise specified):a review[J].Hematol Oncol,2008,26(1):8-20.
  • 2Gallamini A,Stelitano C,Calvi R,et al.Peripheral T-cell lymphoma unspecified(PTCL-U):a new prognostic model from a retrospective multicentric clinical study[J].Blood,2004,103(7):2474-2479.
  • 3Melnyk A,Rodriguez A,Pugh WC,et al.Evaluation of the Revised European-American lymphoma classification confirms the clinical relevance of immunophenotype in 560 cases of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[J].Blood,1997,89(12):4514-4520.
  • 4López-Guillermo A,Cid J,Salar A,et al.Peripheral T-cell lymphomas:initial features,natural history,and prognostic factors in a series of 174 patients diagnosed according to the REAL classification[J].Ann Oncol,1998,9(8):849-855.
  • 5Kim K,Kim WS,Jung CW,et al.Clinical features of peripheral T-cell lymphomas in 78 patients diagnosed according to the Revised European-American Lymphoma(REAL) classification[J].Eur J Cancer,2002,38(1):75-81.
  • 6Niitsu N,Okamoto M,Nakamine H,et al.Clinico-pathologic features and outcome of Japanese patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas[J].Hematol Oncol,2008,26(3):152-158.
  • 7Savage KJ,Chhanabhai M,Gascoyne RD,et al.Characterization of peripheral T-cell lymphomas in a single North American institution by the WHO classification[J].Ann Oncol,2004,15(10):1467-1475.
  • 8Jantunen E,Wiklund T,Juvonen E,et al.Autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma:a nation-wide survey[J].Bone Marrow Transplant,2004,33(4):405-410.
  • 9Arkenau HT,Chong G,Cunninggham D,et al.Gemcitabine,cisplatin and methylprednisolone for the treatment of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma:the royal marsden hospital experience[J].Haematologica,2007,92:271-272.

同被引文献9

  • 1Kim GE,Koom WS,Yang WI,et al.Clinical relevance of three subtypes of primary sinonasal lymphoma characterized by immunophenotypic analysis.Head Neck,2004,26:584-593.
  • 2Cohen MS,Arslan N,Dehdashti F,et al.Risk of malignancy in thyroid incidentalomas identified by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography.Surgery,2001,130:941-946.
  • 3Dimitrakopoulou-Stauss A,Strauss LG,Rudi J.PET-FDG as predictor of therapy response in patients with colorectal carcinoma.Q J Nucl Med,2003,47:8-13.
  • 4Weiler-Sagie M,Bushelev O,Epelbaum R,et al.18F-FDG avidity in lymphoma readdressed:a study of 766 patients.J Nucl Med,2010,51:25-30.
  • 5Hoh CK,Glaspy J,Rosen P,et al.Whole-body FDG PET imaging for staging of Hodgkin' s disease and lymphoma.J Nucl Med,1997,38:343-348.
  • 6Lim ST,Hee SW,Quek R,et al.Comparative analysis of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma:significant differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis.Eur J Haematol,2008,80:55-60.
  • 7Ahmadzadehfar H,Rodrignes M,Zakavi R,et al.Prognostic significance of the standardized uptake value of pre-therapeutic 18 F-FDG PET in patients with malignant lymphoma.Med Onco1,2011,28:1570-1576.
  • 8兰晓莉,张永学,谭旭波,吴志坚,贾清.^18F-FDG PET/CT在恶性淋巴瘤诊断与疗效评估中的作用[J].中国医学影像技术,2009(2):305-308. 被引量:16
  • 9张红宇,孟庆祥,柳金,庞丽萍,王钧,许蕾,冯佳,张文丽,张倩,孙丽华,钟凤鸾,徐海婵,虞积仁.淋巴瘤治疗中期^(18)F-FDG PET检查的临床应用价值[J].中国临床医学,2009,16(2):309-311. 被引量:2

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部