期刊文献+

“共生论与机会主义”——析皮克林的科学发展模式

Symbiosis and Opportunism: on Pickering’s Knowledge Growth Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 皮克林从高能物理学史个案研究,提出科学发展中的"共生"与"机会主义"两个重要概念:宏观上看,实验传统与理论传统呈现相互加强、共同促进的"共生"现象;微观上看,个体科学家处于特定的历史情景中——特有的文化资源、熟悉的研究传统、偶然出现的新生长点等。他(她)若能抓住机遇,利用自身特有的资源投入到新的研究传统中,则能实现认识的转换。范式的转换并不像库恩的"格式塔"式的神秘性,也没有危机与混乱,而是自然平滑地实现。 Based on case study of HEP,Pickering proposed two important concepts: symbiosis and opportunism.From the macro viewpoint,experiment traditions and theory traditions reinforce each other.From the micro viewpoint,the individual scientist is situated in specific context in history with its particular cultural resources,research traditions he or she is familiar with,and the new growth point occasionally emerging.If he or she seizes a good opportunity,makes full use of his or her special resources,and plunges into the new research tradition,then the paradigm shift will be realized.The shift takes place smoothly without crisis or chaos or mysteries as in Thomas S.Ku-hn’s Gestalt Switch.
作者 王延锋
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期13-17,共5页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
关键词 研究传统 共生论 机会主义 research tradition symbiosis opportunism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Pickering A. Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics [ M ]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
  • 2王延锋,刘兵.析皮克林的新旧高能物理学不可通约论[J].自然辩证法通讯,2006,28(5):36-42. 被引量:3
  • 3Picketing A. The Role of Interests in High - Energy Physics: The Choice between Charm and Colour[ C]//Knorr K D, Krohn R, Whitley R D. Sociology of the Sciences,The Social Process of Scientific Investigation. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981 ,4 : 107 - 38.
  • 4劳丹.进步及其问题[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.83.
  • 5Hacking I. Representing and Intervening [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983 : 159.
  • 6Dalitz R H. Fundamental Developments[J]. Nature, 1985, 314:387 -88.
  • 7Roth P, Barrett R. Deconstructing Quarks [ J ]. Social Studies of Science, 1990,20:579 - 632,594.
  • 8Michael Riordan, The Hunting of the Quarks[ M]. Harvard University Press,1987:101 -102.

二级参考文献12

  • 1曹天予,白彤东.社会建构论意味着什么?──一个批判性的评论[J].自然辩证法通讯,1994,16(4):1-9. 被引量:26
  • 2托马斯·库恩.科学革命的结构[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003..
  • 3Pickering, A. Constructing Quarks : A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
  • 4Pendleton, H.25 years of elementary particles:The Cultural Context, Physics Today 1985(7) :75 - 76.
  • 5S.温伯格.《终极理论之梦》.李泳译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2003年版.
  • 6S.温伯格.《仰望苍穹-科学反击文化敌手》.黄艳华,江向东译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2004年版.
  • 7Barnes, B. T. S, Kuhn and Social Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.
  • 8Picketing, A. The Mangle of Practice : Time, Agency and Science, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • 9Pickering, A.Living in the Material Word:On Realism and Experimental, The Uses of Experiment: Studies of Experimentation in the Natural Sciences, 1989.
  • 10Pickering, A. Knowledge, Practice, and Mere Construction, Social Studies of Science, vol. 20(1990) : 682 - 729.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部