期刊文献+

大股东代理与上市公司信息欺诈

Blockholder's Agency Problems and China's Listed Companies' Information Fraud
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与已有研究忽视不同类型信息披露违规的动机差异而将它们混为一体的做法不同,选择一个相对"干净"的信息欺诈样本,研究了上市公司信息欺诈的影响因素。统计发现,69%的公司信息欺诈内容涉及关联交易事项,且绝大多数是与大股东的关联交易。Logistic回归结果表明:大股东持股比例越低,公司信息欺诈可能性越大;民营控股公司比其他公司更容易发生信息欺诈;而董事会特征、地区市场化进程等治理指标则与信息欺诈无关。因此,信息欺诈案例表明,大股东的控股比例越低,大股东的代理问题越不容忽视;在外部治理环境不改善的情况下,控股股东民营化未必能降低上市公司的代理成本。 Different from current literature's ignoring differences of motivations behind kinds of informational violations by China's listed companies, this paper selects a "clean" sample with homogeneous motivation of violation to test which factors cause corporate information fraud. Evidences show that 69 percent companies' frauds involve in related party transactions, most of which are transaction with the blockholder. Logistic regression results show that the fewer the blockholder hold its share, the higher probability the com- pany involve information fraud, and private controlled companies are more likely to involve fraud than other companies. However, other corporate governance measures, such as independence of board of directors and local marketization level are unrelated to corporate information fraud. Once the blockholder gets control rights, less shares held by the blockholder, more serious the blockholder's agency problems are, and privatization of the blockholder of listed companies does not necessarily means decrease of their agency costs if external governance environments dont improve greatly.
出处 《财贸研究》 CSSCI 2010年第2期112-119,共8页 Finance and Trade Research
基金 教育部重点研究基地重大项目"制度安排与独立审计治理功能"(2009JJD790030)的阶段性成果 全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资助项目(2007B75) 国家自然科学基金项目(70702009)资助
关键词 大股东 代理问题 信息欺诈 blockholder agency problems information fraud
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献63

  • 1张维迎,柯荣住.信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):59-70. 被引量:990
  • 2李增泉,孙铮,任强.所有权安排与现金股利政策——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].中国会计与财务研究,2004,6(4):48-93. 被引量:34
  • 3陈国进,赵向琴,林辉.上市公司违法违规处罚和投资者利益保护效果[J].财经研究,2005,31(8):48-58. 被引量:59
  • 4Alford, William ,2000, "The More Law, the More… ?Measuring Legal Reform in the People's Republic of China",Working Paper No. 59, Stanford Center for International Development, Stanford University.
  • 5Allen, Franklin, Jun Qian, and Meijun Qian, 2004, "Law,Finance, and Economic Growth in China", Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming.
  • 6Bhattacharya,U., and H. Daouk, 2002, "The World Price of Insider Trading", Journal of Finance, 57, pp.75-108.
  • 7Bhattacharya,U., and H. Daouk, 2005, "When No law is Better than a Good Law", Working Paper, Indiana University.
  • 8Beasley, Mark S., 1996, "An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud", Accounting Review, 71,pp.433-465.
  • 9Berkowitz, Daniel, Katharina Pistor, and Jean-Francois Richrad, 2003, "Economic Development, Legality, and the transplant Effect", European Economic Review, 47 ( 1 ) :pp. 165-195.
  • 10Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Lang, L.H.P., 2000,"The Seperation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations", Journal of Financial Economics , 58, pp.81-112.

共引文献1791

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部