摘要
在刑法的客观解释中,为了降低裁量的自由度,可以从时间、语义可能性、国民预测可能性以及刑法目的等四个方面,对法官加以约束。可是这些约束要素的效能并不充足,面对困境,客观解释论者寻求通过对话的客观性来确保这种解释目标的客观性和正当性。
In objective interpretation of criminal law,some theorist think we can constrain the judges to reduce freedom of discretion from four aspects including time,semantic possibility,possibility of people's calculation and purpose of criminal law. Unfortunately,efficiency of these restrictive elements is not sufficient. Facing dilemma,the assertors of objective interpretation try to ensure objectivity and legitimacy of the explanatory aim by objectivity of dialogue.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第2期103-107,共5页
Legal Forum
基金
南开大学2009年度人文社会科学青年项目<刑法客观解释的约束困境及其思考>(NKQ09030)的阶段性成果
关键词
刑法解释
客观解释
对话
共识
interpretation of criminal law
objective interpretation
dialogue
consensus