期刊文献+

火山碎屑岩的储层物性——以松辽盆地营城组为例 被引量:28

Porosity and Permeability of Pyroclastic Rocks of the Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对松辽盆地营城组35口盆内深层钻井和2口剖面浅钻全取心井的对比研究揭示:在浅层(埋深〈500 m),火山碎屑岩储层物性(平均孔隙度18.7%、渗透率0.32×10^-3μm^2)好于熔岩(14.0%,0.18×10^-3μm^2);在深层(埋深〉2 800 m),火山碎屑岩物性(2.6%,0.05×10^-3μm^2)明显差于熔岩(7.3%,0.07×10^-3μm^2)。熔岩和火山碎屑岩的储层物性总体上都随埋深增加而变差,但火山碎屑岩的变化率显著大于熔岩;所以当大于一定埋深(2 500~3 000 m)时,熔岩的物性优于火山碎屑岩而成为主力储层。熔岩与火山碎屑岩物性随埋深变化的差异主要源于它们成岩方式的不同:前者冷凝固结,骨架体积受压实影响很小;后者压实固结成岩,其特点同沉积岩。在中浅层勘探中(埋深小于2 500 m)火山碎屑岩可作为重点目标。 Correlation among 35 in-basin boreholes and 2 continuous field coring sections resulted that porosity and permeability of pyroclastic rocks(mean 18.7%,0.32×10-3μm2) are higher than that of volcanic lava rocks(mean 14.0%,0.18×10-3μm2) in the shallow part of basin with burial depth less than 500 meters,while contrarily in the deep part of basin with burial depth more than 2 800 meters,porosity and permeability of pyroclastic rocks(mean 2.6%,0.05×10-3μm2) are rather poor than volcanic lava rocks(mean7.3%,0.07×10-3μm2).Generally,porosity and permeability of both two types of rocks decrease with increasing burial depth,however,the changing rate of pyroclastic rocks is remarkably larger than that of volcanic lava rocks.Therefore,volcanic lava rocks become primary reservoir due to higher porosity and permeability than pyroclastic rocks when burial depth range is below 2 500 to 3 000 meters.This is mainly contributed by their differences in diagenesis as volcanic lavas are concreted by cooling so that their framework volume is hardly affected by compaction,while pyroclastic rocks are consolidated by compaction,similarly to sedimentary rocks.Therefore,petroleum exploration in the middle and shallow part of basin(burial depth less than 2 500 meters) could attentively aim at pyroclastic rocks.
出处 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期227-236,共10页 Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2007CB209507 2009CB219303)
关键词 松辽盆地 白垩系营城组 火山碎屑岩 孔隙度 渗透率 Songliao basin Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation pyroclastic rocks porosity permeability
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Remy R R.Porosity reduction and major controls on diagenesis of Cretaceous-Paleocene volcaniclastic and arkosic sandstone,Middle Park basin,Colorado[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,1994,64(4):797-806.
  • 2Schutter S R.Occurrences of hydrocarbons in and around igneous rocks[J].Geological Society,London,Special Publications,2003,214:35-68.
  • 3French D E,Freeman K J.Tertiary volcanic stratigraphy and reservoir characteristics of Trap Spring Field,Nye County,Nevada[C] //Basin and range symposium.Denver:Utah Geological Association,1979:487-502.
  • 4Vernik L.A new type of reservoir rock in vo-lcaniclastic sequences[J].AAPG Bull,1990,74:830-836.
  • 5Bergman S C,Talbot J P,Thompson P R.The Kora Miocene submarine andesite stratovolcano hydrocarbon reservoir,northern Taranaki basin,New Zealand[C] // New Zealand Oil Exploration Conference,proceedings.Wellington:Ministry of Commerce,1992:178-206.
  • 6Levin L E.Volcanogenic and volcaniclastic reservoir rocks in Mesozoic-Cenozoic island arcs:examples from the Caucasus and the NW Pacific[J].J Petroleum Geol,1995,18:267-288.
  • 7Cutiongco E,Warren J.Porosity and permeability controls in volcaniclastic sediments and their relationship to wireline data from the Sultan-Sa-Barongis prospect,Mindanao,Phillipines[C] //AAPG International Conference,Meeting Abstract.Barcelona:[s.n],2003.
  • 8Gecer B A.Diagenesis of Upper Eocene volcaniclastic rocks and its relevance to hydrocarbon exploration in the Thrace basin,Turkey[J].Energy Sources,2006,28(9/12):1039-1049.
  • 9HUANG Yulong,WANG Pujun,CHEN Shuming.Distribution and characteristics of volcanic reservoirs in China[J].Global Geology,2009,12(2):64-79. 被引量:10
  • 10王留奇,赵澄林,刘孟慧.二连盆地阿南油田阿三油组火山碎屑沉积成因探讨[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1991,15(4):1-7. 被引量:5

二级参考文献151

共引文献879

同被引文献532

引证文献28

二级引证文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部