白鹭洲书院首任山长考辨

Argument on the first Master of Bailuzhou Academy

由于有关白鹭洲书院的存世史料匮乏以及各研究者对山长之称理解迥异,故研究者对白鹭洲书院首任山长之见,众说并存、莫衷一是。本文针对部分研究者的观点,结合一些史实,分别对曾主讲或讲学于白鹭洲书院的江万里、胡楚浚、欧阳守道等七位学者进行了山长考辨,再分析出其中可能的首任山长,以此释疑并启发于同仁。

There are so many opinions to the first master of Bailuzhou Academy due to the scarce of materials and the different understanding on the master.To argue against these opinions,the author displays lots of materials as evidence to study on Jiang Wanli,Hu Chunjun,Ouyang Shoudao and other four persons who had worked in the academy before.Then the author give his own opinion to the others,that who should be the first master in Bailuzhou Academy.It is important to clarify some wrong opinions to continue the study.