期刊文献+

论我国城市房屋拆迁补偿制度之重构 被引量:6

On the Reconfiguration of the Compensation System in the Urban Housing Demolition and Relocation in our Country
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国现行法对城市房屋拆迁补偿性质的定位存在着误区,表现在将补偿问题定位为民事法律关系。这种误区是导致补偿问题复杂难解的深层法律原因。拆迁补偿关系应该属于行政法律关系,拆迁补偿性质为行政征收补偿,政府才是真正的补偿义务主体,政府应直接对被拆迁人承担补偿义务。拆迁补偿应以公正合理补偿为基本原则,尽可能全面弥补当事人因公共利益而遭受的实际损失。仅就补偿标准而言,公正补偿应体现民法精神,但不可将其与民事赔偿简单等同。 The existing law in our country has a misunderstanding of the nature of the compensation problem in the urban housing demolition and relocation.Namely,our law defines this compensation as a civil legal relationship.This misunderstanding should be regarded as the fundamental legal reason led to the complexity and insolubility of the compensation problem.Compensation relationships in the demolition and relocation should belong to the administrative legal relationship,and should be considered as a kind of administrative imposition and compensation in nature.In fact,our government should be the real subject to undertake the compensation obligations directly to the dismantled whose house is removed and relocated.With fair and reasonable compensatory approaches as the basic principle,the compensation in the demolition and relocation should,as possible as it can and in an all-round way,make up for the actual loss of the dismantled,resulted by the implementation of the public interest.As far as compensatory standards are concerned alone,impartial compensation should embody the spirit of civil law,but should not be simply identified with civil compensation.
作者 张向东
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期223-227,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 西南政法大学重点科研项目(09XZ-ZD-11)
关键词 城市房屋拆迁 补偿 协议 行政征收 urban housing demolition and relocation compensation agreement administrative imposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1佚名.居民暴力抗强拆背后:物权法与拆迁条例矛盾凸显[DB/OL].(2009-11-22)[2009-12-10].http://news.sina.com.cn/c/sd/2009-11-22/013519100056.shtml.
  • 2佚名.拆迁条例与宪法相抵触国务院正组织调研修改[DB/OL].(2009-1209)[2009-12-15].http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2009-12-09/024616739346s.shtml.
  • 3崔建远.论房屋拆迁制度的重建[N].人民法院报,2007-06-06.
  • 4孙宪忠.政府是拆迁主体[N].新京报,2008-09-13.
  • 5李珍贵.美国土地征用制度[J].中国土地,2001(4):45-46. 被引量:80
  • 6孟德斯鸠.论法的精神(下册)[M].孙立坚,译.西安:陕西人民出版社,2001:573-574.
  • 7陈新民.德国公法学基础理论(下)[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2003.
  • 8佚名.给“钉子户”的天价补偿损害了谁的利益[DB/OL].(2007-09-30)[2009-11-08].http://www.tianshannet.com.cn/pn/content/2007-09/30/content_2211990.htm.
  • 9翟垣.北京市拆迁补偿将参照市场价两次试点总体成功[N].京华时报,2009-06-17(12).

共引文献81

同被引文献39

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部