期刊文献+

基于风险评价的重大火灾隐患判定方法 被引量:10

Major fire hazard judgment method based on risk assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 定义了广义和狭义的重大火灾隐患,分析了火灾隐患与火灾风险的关系。根据我国火灾统计数据,结合FN曲线和回归分析方法,确定了我国火灾社会可容忍风险及建筑重大火灾隐患判定标准。将所建立的方法应用于建筑重大火灾隐患工程评估中。运用事件树建立了具有代表性的火灾场景。运用FDS5.0火灾模拟软件和BuildingEXOUDS4.06疏散软件计算得到了各类火灾场景导致人员伤亡的量化结果。对某大厦判定结果显示,该单位存在重大火灾隐患。 The generalized and narrow sense definition of major fire potential is given. The relationship between buildings' fire hazard and fire risk is analyzed. Fire acceptable risk criterion has been established using FN curves and regression analysis method based on our country's fire statistic data. The approach is applied in the judgment of building major fire hazard. The representative fire scenario is set up by event tree analysis. The casualty of different fire scenario is given using fire simulation software FDS 5.0 and evacuation software BuildingEXOUDS 4. 06. Results show that the building has major fire hazard.
出处 《消防科学与技术》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第4期327-331,共5页 Fire Science and Technology
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目"城市火灾危险性评估技术研究及应用示范"(2006BAK06B01-1)
关键词 火灾 重大火灾隐患 风险评价 fire major fire hazard risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献19

  • 1肖义,郭生练,熊立华,雒征.大坝安全评价的可接受风险研究与评述[J].安全与环境学报,2005,5(3):90-94. 被引量:39
  • 2杨云伦.火灾隐患认定标准的应用技术研究与探讨[J].消防技术与产品信息,1997(1):36-38. 被引量:5
  • 3公安部消防局.防火手册[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1992..
  • 4WANG Fu--liang, LU Shou-- xiang, LI Chang-- hal. Analysis of fire statistics of China fire frequency and fatalities: fires proceedings of the 8th international symposium on fire safety science, Beijing, China, September 18- 23[C], International Association of Fire Safety Science, Gottuk.
  • 5Fredrik. Tolerable fire risk criteria for hospitals[R]. Lund, Sweden: Department of Fire Safety Engineering, Lund University, 1999.
  • 6DAVIDSSON G, LINDGREN M, METT L. Evaluation of risk. SRV report P21--182/97[R]. Karlstad, 1997.
  • 7范维澄.Development of building fire risk assessment: Proc' 99 International Symp on City Fire Safety, Heifei, China, Octobor 6-- 12[C]. Hefei: 1999.
  • 8BOTTELBERGHS P H. Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherland[J]. Hazard Mater, 2000,(71):59--84.
  • 9TAW,Technical advisory committee on water defences, some considerations of an acceptable level of risk in the Netherland[R]. TAW, 1985.
  • 10BOHNENBLUS H. Risk--based decision making in the transportation sector, In: R E Jorissen, P J M Stallen(Eds. ), Quantified societal risk and policy making[M]. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

共引文献45

同被引文献59

引证文献10

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部