摘要
主权具有身份权和具体权能两个方面的属性、内涵,这两者各有其特点、意义和功能。一方面,身份权界定和表征着主体地位及主体间相互关系,从而确立和维护着国际社会的身份秩序及其利益格局;另一方面,主权权能则界定和表征着主体对客体的实际掌控的权力或能力,从而为国家的国别利益提供手段与保障。在这两方面内涵的相互关系上,既有的理论模式存在严重的缺陷,身份权和具体权能并非本源与派生关系等,两种属性、内涵之间应是平行的辩证统一关系,从而构成一个完整的主权概念及规范。
Sovereignty has two aspects of attribute and connotation, namely right of status and concrete power, which have their characteristics, meaning and function respectively. On the one hand, right of status defines and represents subject position and the correlation of subjects, establishing and supporting international society of identity order and its interest structure; on the other hand, the sovereignty power indicates physical domination and manipulation towards objects, thus providing means and guarantee for individual benefits of state. The correlation of both sides should not be derivative. The two aspects, parallel and dialectic form integrity of sovereignty.
出处
《西南交通大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2010年第2期133-141,共9页
Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
基金
博士科研启动基金资助项目
关键词
主权
身份权
权能
国际法
国际社会
国际主体
sovereignty
right of status
power
International Law
international society
international subject
