期刊文献+

七种军队医学期刊临床随机对照试验的报告质量评价 被引量:4

Assessment of Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Seven Journals Using the CONSORT Statement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的调查7种军队综合性医学期刊2007年发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的报告质量,了解当前军队医学期刊临床试验报告质量的现状。方法手工检索2007年《解放军医学杂志》、《南方医科大学学报》、《第二军医大学学报》、《第三军医大学学报》、《第四军医大学学报》、《军事医学科学院院刊》和《军医进修学院学报》发表的文献,纳入声明采用"随机"方法分组的RCT,并采用国际公认的CONSORT标准进行报告质量评价。结果共纳入99篇RCT,其中6篇随机方法错误。根据CONSORT条目对随机方法正确的93篇RCT进行评价,其中62篇(66.7%)描述了各组的基线情况和临床特征;16篇(17.2%)提及了产生随机分配序列的方法,其中5篇(5.4%)提及用计算机产生随机分配序列;9篇(9.7%)采用盲法的文献中2篇仅提及"盲法"二字,1篇采用单盲,6篇采用双盲(其中2篇盲法正确);仅1篇文献采用意向治疗分析法;1篇分配方案隐藏充分。99篇均未提及样本含量的计算,且样本量多较小。结论目前军队综合性医学期刊发表的RCT报告质量与CONSORT标准比较尚有较大差距,今后应进一步进行规范报告。 Objective To evaluate the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in seven military medical journals. Methods Seven journals in 2007, including Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Journal of South Medical University, Journal of Second Military Medical University, Journal of Third Military Medical University, Journal of Fourth Military Medical University, Bulletin of the Academy of Military of Medical Sciences and Academic Journal of PLA Postgraduate Medical School, were handsearched. We identified RCTs labeled “random” and assessed the quality of these reports using the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement. Results We identified 99 RCTs, but found an incorrect randomized method was used in 6 RCTs. According to the items in the CONSORT statement in 93 RCTs, 62 (66.7%) RCTs described baseline demographic and clinical characteristics in each group. Sixteen (17.2%) RCTs mentioned the method of random sequence generation, with 5 (5.4%) using a computer allocation. Only 1 RCT had adequate allocation concealment. Only 9 (9.7%) RCTs used blinding, with 2 mentioning blinding, 1 using single blinding and 6 described as double-blind (2 were correct). Zero (0%) reported the sample size calculation and 1 RCT reported the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Conclusion The reporting quality of RCTs in seven journals is poor. The CONSORT statement should be used to standardize the reporting of RCTs.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2010年第4期501-504,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 军队医学期刊 CONSORT标准 随机对照试验 报告质量 Military medical journal CONSORT Randomized controlled trial Reporting quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献18

  • 1李廷谦,王刚,王蕾,毛兵.我国中医药临床研究的现状和评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(6):431-437. 被引量:36
  • 2张小澍,袁玉民,匡培根,吴卫平,张凤英,刘洁晓.急性脑梗塞患者VIP,SS,PP改变及电针对其的影响[J].针刺研究,1996,21(4):10-16. 被引量:17
  • 3Park J,Hophood V,White AR,et al.Effectiveness of acupuncture for stroke:A systematic review.Journal of Neurology,2001; 248(7):558-63.
  • 4Johansson K,Lindgren I,Widner H,et al.Can sensory stimulation improve the functional outcome in stroke patients? Neurology,1993;43:2189-2192.
  • 5Gunilla GH,Lisbet C,Ulrika K,et al.Effects of Acupuncture Treatment on Daily Life Activities and Quality of Life.Stroke,1998;29:2100-2108.
  • 6Johansson BB,Haker E,Arbin MV,et al.Acupuncture and transcutaneous nerve stimulation in stroke rehabilitation-A randomized,controlled trial.Stroke,2001; 32:707-713.
  • 7Altman DG,Schulz K,Moher D,et al.The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials Explanation and Elaboration.Ann Intern Med,2001; 134(8):663-694.
  • 8MacPherson H,White A,Cummings M,et al.STRICTA(Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture).Acupuncture in Medicine,2002; 20(1):22-25.
  • 9Schulz KF,Chalmers I,Hayes RJ,et al.Empirical evidence of bias-dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.JAMA,1995; 272:408-412.
  • 10段国俊,唐强,张春英,杨宇,张波,孙申田.不同部位脑梗塞针刺效应比较[J].中国针灸,1997,17(10):591-593. 被引量:13

共引文献70

同被引文献66

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部