Rule B下的EFTs扣押被宣判“死缓”——美国联邦第二巡回上诉法院最新判例the“Jaldhi”案评述

EFTs under Rule B granted a "Reprieve"——Comments on the recent decision in "Jaldhi" by the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals

通过对美国联邦第二巡回上诉法院在the"Jaldhi"案中判决的评述,分析Rule B下电子汇款转账扣押的发展演变过程及该案判决不再被看做是Rule B下"财产"的原因,并就该判决给实践带来的影响提出应对措施。

This paper comments on the decision in the ＂Jaldhi＂case by the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals,analyzes the development of the EFTs attachment under Rule B and the reason why EFTs being processed by an intermediary bank are not property subject to attachment under Rule B,and further gives suggestions on the possible countermeasures that could be taken in practice.