先行行为范围研究

A Study on the Scope of Antecedent Actions in Omission Crimes

先行行为的范围一直是刑法理论研讨的重点,如何对其进行合理的界定关系到刑法功利和公正价值的实现。原则上,先行行为应当以违反法律规范为必要,但是,在对行为人施加作为义务不与刑法允许的其他更高价值目标相矛盾的情况下,合法行为也能引起作为义务。在刑法并未对先行行为本身作出法律评价,如规定为结果加重犯、转化犯等前提下,应当肯定犯罪行为引起的作为义务。先行行为既可以是作为,也可以是不作为。既可以是出于故意或者过失实施的行为,也可以是无责行为。

The qualities and ranges of antecedent actions are always the focus in academic study of criminology,its boundary is decisive to the implementation of justice and utilitarian in criminal law.In principle,antecedent actions should violate law,however,in some special conditions,licit actions can also bring about act duty unless there are in contradiction with other higher value of criminal law.It should be admitted that criminal actions can bring on act duty if the criminal law does not stipulate other felonies.antecedent actions can also be omission.At the same time,antecedent actions can be done out of intention,negligence and even no fault.