期刊文献+

论提单物权性——以提单属性上的物权与债权之争为切入点 被引量:2

Bill of Lading as Document of Title——By analyzing the controversy between obligationenrechte and sachenrechte in defining the function of B/L
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为物权凭证,是指提单能代表货物本身的性质。但提单是物权凭证这一几近共识性的观点,近年来却有学者提出质疑与否定,以此为契机对提单物权凭证功能再予思考,从债权与物权的划分中论证提单是物权凭证的观点。意在体现海商法与民法之融通,以期对凭单交货、无单放货回归到提单权属上的研习有所意义。 As a document of title, bill of lading presents the cargo. However, the almost common sense that bill of lading as a document of title manifests the real rights of the cargo is queried and denied by some scholars in recent years. The author re-ponders on this problem and makes the conclusion that bill of lading manifests the real rights of cargo by analyzing the controversy between obligationenrechte ( rights derived from Obligation) and sachenrechte (real rights) in defining the function of bill of lading. The purpose of this paper is to expand the paths of thinking to demonstrate the real-rights function of the bill of lading with the hope of making some significance on the research of the issues on the delivery of cargo without producing bill of lading.
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期121-126,共6页 Hebei Law Science
关键词 提单 物权凭证 债权属性 bill of lading document of title real property
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Paul Todd. Bills of Lading and Bankers Documentary Credits ( fourth edition) , London : Informa, 2007, pp. 3 - 5.
  • 2[英]PaulTodd.郭国汀,赖民泽.现代提单的法律和实务[M].大连海事大学出版社,1992.5.
  • 3[台]史尚宽.物权法沦[M].中国政法大学出版社,2000.11,10,150-156.
  • 4Bradford Stone. Uniform Commercial Code ( fifth edition) , Law Press, China, 2004, p. 338.
  • 5谢伟译 司玉琢校.问题单的回答概要.中国海商法协会通讯,2000,3.
  • 6Benjamin's Sale of Goods (seventh edition), Swee[& Maxwell, 2006, pp. 1126.
  • 7Nippon Yusen Kaisha v. Ramjiban Serowjee (1938) 60 Lloyld' s Rep. 181.
  • 8The Marlborough Hill ( 1921 ) A. C.444, The Lycaon ( 1981 ) 1 Lloyd' s Rep. 548, Diamond Alkali Export Corporation v. FI. Bourgeois (1921) 3 K. B. 443.
  • 9Law Commission No. 196: Rights of Suit in Respect of Carriage of Goods by Sea (London, 1991 ) , para. 4.12.
  • 10邢海宝.《无单放货新解》,载《2007年海商法研讨会论文集》,第149页.

同被引文献30

  • 1李金泽.议付信用证有关法律问题研究[J].中国法学,2001(5):85-95. 被引量:11
  • 2苗晓飞.信用证条件下银行对提单的权利属性[J].中国海商法年刊,1996(1):94-101. 被引量:2
  • 3李涛.信用证项下银行持有提单的权利分析[J].对外经贸实务,2006(7):15-18. 被引量:2
  • 4北京保险公司与日本三井海商货物运输合同货损赔偿纠纷案[EB/OL].(2007-3-23)[2010-8-17]http://china.findlaw.cn/info/minshang/haishihaishangfa/54104.html.
  • 5Cole v North Western Bank (1875) LR 10, CP 372.
  • 6大连某某食品有限公司上诉韩国某海产品有限公司信用证欺诈纠[EB/OL].(2009-11-12)[2010-8-17]http://www. law - lib. com/cpws/cpws_view, asp? id = 200401399171.
  • 7Surapol Onoora, "The Bill of Lading As a Document of Title: Right of Action Under the Bills of Lading Act 1855" M, MacGill Univeristy, Montreal, November 1990, P8- 10, P27.
  • 8Sir Guenter Treitel, F. M. B, Reynolds, " Carver on Bills of Lading", London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2nd Edition, 2005, p267.
  • 9杨良宜.提单及其运付单证.[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.
  • 10胡正良,曹冲.对提单的物权凭证功能的在思考[A].中国海商法年刊(1996年刊)[M].大连:大连海事大学出版社,1997.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部