期刊文献+

股票流动性、公司治理与企业经营绩效——基于退出威胁与锁定效应的理论与实证研究 被引量:9

Stock Liquidity,Corporate Governance and Firm Operating Performance:Theory and Evidence Based on the Threat of Exit and Lock-in Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章采用博弈论的分析框架探讨了股票流动性的两大效应,即"退出威胁"与"锁定效应"。研究表明,当股票流动性较低时,机构投资者的退出策略不可行,被迫参与上市公司的监督行为,即表现为"锁定效应",且股票流动性越低,这一效应越明显。然而,随着股票流动性的进一步增强,机构投资者的退出策略开始变得可信,从而可以通过一定的触发策略迫使管理者选择尽职,因而表现为"退出威胁",且股票流动性越高,这一效应越明显。因此,总的说来,股票流动性与经营绩效之间会呈现一个先减后增的U型关系。文章采用高频交易数据构造相对有效价差与相对报价价差衡量股票流动性对上述假说进行了检验,其实证结论支持了文中的假说。 Based on the conflict between controlling shareholders and small& medium shareholders, the paper analyzes the two effects of stock liquidity-" threat of exit" and "lock-in effect". The result shows that when the stock liquidity is low, the exit strategy of the institutional investors is infeasible, so the institutional investors have to monitor listed companies, i.e. the "lock-in effect", and the lower the stock liquidity, the stronger the effect. However, the exit strategy becomes credible along with the enhancing of the stock liquidity, so the institutional investor can set a trigger strategy to force managers to do their duties, and this effect is called "the threat of exit", and the higher the stock liquidity, the stronger this effect. As a whole, the relationship between stock liquidity and operating performance is a U-shape. On the basis of high frequency data of listed companies from Shenzhen and Shanghai stock markets from 2003 to 2007, the paper tests the above hypothesis by employing relative effective spread and quoted spread, and the result verifies our hypothesis.
作者 顾乃康 陈辉
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期57-66,90,共11页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"现金持有量的决定与价值研究"(70772079) 教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目"制度约束下企业融资中的择时行为研究"(07JA630023) 广东省软科学项目"广东资本市场的发展与企业可持续自主创新机制的构建"(0711520600036)
关键词 股票流动性 经营绩效 公司治理 锁定效应 退出威胁 stock liquidity operating performance corporate governance threat of exit lock-in effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1KYLE A S,VILA J L.Noise Trading and Takeovers[J].RAND Journal of Economics,1991,22(1):54-71.
  • 2BHIDE A.The Hidden Costs of Stock Market Liquidity[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1993,34 (1):31-51.
  • 3MAUG E.Large Shareholders as Monitors:Is There a Trade-off between Liquidity and Control[J].Journal of Finance,1998,53(1):65-98.
  • 4EDAMNS A.Blockholder Trading,Market Efficiency and Managerial Myopia[J].Journal of Finance,2009,64 (6):2481-2513.
  • 5ADMATI A,PFLERDERER P.The" Wall Street Walk" and Shareholder Activism:Exit as a Form of Voice[J].Review of Financial Studies,2009,22(7):2645-2685.
  • 6HOLMSTROM B,TIROLE J.Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring[J].Journal of Political Economy,1993,101 (4):678-709.
  • 7KHANNA N,SONTI R.Value Creating Stock Manipulation:Feedback Effect of Stock Prices on Firm Value[J].Journal of Financial Markets,2004,7 (3):237-270.
  • 8GILLAN L S,STARKS T L.The Evolution of Shareholder Activism in the United States[J].Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,2007,19(1):55-73.
  • 9SHLEIFER A,VISHNY W R.A Survey of Corporate Governance[J].Journal of Finance,1997,52 (2):737-783.
  • 10李向前.机构投资者、公司治理与资本市场稳定研究[J].南开经济研究,2002(2):69-73. 被引量:69

二级参考文献4

共引文献665

同被引文献217

引证文献9

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部