期刊文献+

腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗输尿管连接处梗阻疗效观察 被引量:1

Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Pyeloplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻(UPJO)的临床疗效及其可行性。方法:对50例UPJO均有不同程度肾盂积水患者分别使用Anderson-Hynes、Foley Y-V成形术、Fenger成形术及Hellst rom成形术进行治疗。结果:50例手术均获成功,无一例中转开放手术。手术时间2.5~4.5 h,出血量35~88 ml。40例术后随访6~24个月,IVP检查UPJ吻合口未见狭窄,肾盂输尿管排尿功能好,手术侧肾盂积水明显减轻或基本消失。结论:腹腔镜肾盂成形术具有术中创伤小、术后恢复快、疼痛减轻的优点,效果优于开放手术,是既安全又有效的微创手术方法。 Objective:To elucidate the clinical curative effect s and feasibilities of the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction by transabdominal laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Methods:The clinical data of 50 cases of patient s with UPJO were collected from 2001 to 2009. 50 cases with ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction underwent by transabdominal laparoscopic pyeloplasty. As laparoscopic pyeloplasties , Foley Y-V pyeloplasty , Fenger pyeloplasty and Hellst r? m techniques were resorted base on the judgement s and flit rations during the operations. Results: All the operations have been successfuL. There was no conversion to open surgery, the operating time being 2.5 to 4.5 h and the blood loss 35 to 88 ml. Ultrasound B investigation 3 months after the procedure showed no hydronephrosis in all and IVP analysis in 40 cases 6 to 24 months after the operation disclosed good outcome with less morbidity. Conclusions: As compared to open pyeloplasty , laparoscopic pyeloplasty has the advantages of rapid recovery , less pain , mini invasion and less blood loss. It was a safe, and effective way to treat UPJ obstruction with minimal trauma to the patient.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 北大核心 2010年第1期30-32,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻 腹腔镜 肾盂成形术 transabdominal laparoscopic ureteropelvic junction obstruction pyeloplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1ZHAN GX,LI H Z,WANG SG,et al.Ret roperitoeal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty:experience of 50 cases[J].Urology,2005,66,514-517.
  • 2Kavoussi L R,Peters C A.Laparoscopic pyeloplasty[J].J Urol,1993,150:1891-1894.
  • 3Jarrett T W,Chan D Y,Charambura T C,et al.Laparoseopic pyeloplasty;the first 100 cases[J].J Urol,2002,167:1253-1256.
  • 4Moore R G,Averch T D,Schulam P G,et al.Laparocopic pyeloplasty:Experience with the initial 30 cases[J].J Urol 1997,157:459-462.
  • 5Kingler H C,Remzi M,Janetschek G,et al.Comparison of open versus Laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction[J].Eur Urol,2003,44(3):340-345.
  • 6Renner C,Frede T,Seeman O,et al.Laser endopyelotomy minimally invasive therapy of ureteropelvic junction stenosis[J].J Endourol,1998,12:537-544.
  • 7Gunter J,Michael M.Laparoscopic surgery in urology[J].Urology,2000,10:351-357.
  • 8Soulie M,Seguin P,Richeux L,et al.Urological complications of laparoscopic surgery:experience with 350 procedures at a single center[J].J Urol,2001,165:1960-1963.
  • 9Chen R N,Moore R G,Kavoussi L R,et al.Laparoscopic pyeloplasty.Indication,technique,and Iongterm outcome[J].Urol Clin North Am,1998,25:323-330.
  • 10Bauer J J,Bishoff J T,Moore R G,et al.Lapamscopic versus open pyeloplasty:assessment of objective and subjective outcome[J].J Urol,1999,162:692-695.

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部