期刊文献+

微型种植体支抗近移磨牙过程中的强支抗效应 被引量:12

Evaluation of micro-implant transition mesially molar by implant anchorage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:在正畸治疗中,移动下颌磨牙需要强大的支抗控制,这也成为临床正畸所遇到的一个难题。目的:采用微型种植体作支抗,观察近移安氏Ⅰ类错患者下颌磨牙的临床效果及其作用特点。方法:选择15例下颌第一磨牙缺失成人患者,将24枚微型种植体植于下颌第二前磨牙与第一前磨牙之间颊侧牙槽骨内,Ni-Ti螺旋弹簧拉长后置于下颌第二磨牙与微型种植体之间,拉磨牙近中移动。通过测量下颌第二磨牙在近远中方向、垂直向的位置变化,以衡量磨牙的位置改变。并通过下颌中切牙的位置变化,评价支抗强弱。结果与结论:疗程10.4个月,下颌第二磨牙平均移动速度为0.8mm/月;平均近中移动8.5mm,垂直向没有变化;磨牙长轴向远中倾斜角度为2.5°,下颌中切牙位置无改变。提示所有下颌第二磨牙均被近移到了恰当的位置,未见前牙支抗丧失。种植体作为支抗在拉下颌磨牙近移的过程中,发挥了强支抗的作用。 BACKGROUND:It needs strong anchorage for shifting mandibular molar in orthodontics,which is a difficult problem to clinical orthodontic doctors.OBJECTIVE:To evaluate clinical effects and the characters by micro-implant anchorage during mandibular molars mesialization in Class I malocclusal patients.METHODS:A total of 24 micro-implants were embedded mandibular bones between mandibular second premolar and mandibular first premolar of 15 Angle I malocclusal patients as clinical anchorages for mesializing mandibular molars.The position changes of mandibular molars were measured from mesiodistal direction and vertical direction,and the implant anchorage loss was evaluated by maxillary central incisor.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The course of treatment was 10.4 months,and the velocity of mandibular second molar mesializing was 0.8 mm per month,with 8.5 mm in mesiodistal direction,there was no changes in the vertical direction.The distal tipping angle of molar was 2.5°,and the mandibular central incisor did not move.The method successfully mesialized mandibular molars to appropriate positions.No anchorage loss was found.The implant plays absolute anchorage during mandibular molar mesialization.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期1577-1580,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Brennan DS,Luzzi L,Roberts-Thomson KF.Dental service patterns among private and public adult patients in Australia.BMC Health Serv Res.2008;8:1.
  • 2Arigbede AO,Dosumu OO,Esan TA,et al.Acceptability of maxillary major connectors in removable partial dentures.Afr Health Sci.2006;6(2):113-117.
  • 3Haney KL.Current trends in primary tooth pulp therapy.J Okla Dent Assoc.2007;99(2):28-37.
  • 4Veltri M,Ferrari M,Balleri P.Stability values of titanium dioxide-blasted dental implants in edentulous maxillas:a 3-year pilot study.J Oral Rehabil.2009.
  • 5Krarup S,Darvann TA,Larsen P,et al.Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular growth and tooth eruption.J Anat.2005;207(5):669-682.
  • 6Ohazama A,Haycraft C J,Seppala M,et al.Primary cilia regulate Shh activity in the control of molar tooth number.Development.2009;136(6):897-903.
  • 7Holliday S,Schneider B,Galang MT,et al.Bones,teeth,and genes:a genomic homage to Harry Sicher's "Axial Movement of Teeth".World J Orthod.2005;6(1):61-70.
  • 8Orhan AI,Oz FT,Ozcelik B,et al.A clinical and microbiological comparative study of deep carious lesion treatment in deciduous and young permanent molars.Clin Oral Investig.2008;12(4):369-378.
  • 9Gunjigake KK,Goto T,Nakao K,et al.Activation of satellite glial cells in rat trigeminal ganglion after upper molar extraction.Acta Histochem Cytochem.2009;42(5):143-149.
  • 10Koussoulakou DS,Margaritis LH,Koussoulakos SL.A curriculum vitae of teeth:evolution,generation,regeneration.Int J Biol Sci.2009;5(3):226-243.

二级参考文献10

共引文献9

同被引文献80

引证文献12

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部