摘要
目的探讨腰-硬联合麻醉复合咪达唑仑应用于妇科腹腔镜手术的可行性和安全性。方法择期妇科腹腔镜手术的病人(ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级)500例,随机分成腰-硬联合麻醉复合咪达唑仑组(CSEA组)和气管内插管全身麻醉组(全麻组),各250例,记录HR、RR、MAP、SpO2以及清醒时间、术后24小时不良反应,并进行对比研究。结果两组HR、RR、MAP、SpO2麻醉前后变化比较差异无显著性(P〉0.05),而清醒时间、不良反应方面CSEA组均优于全麻组。结论腰-硬联合麻醉复合咪达唑仑应用于妇科腹腔镜手术的可行的和安全的,较全身麻醉简便、经济。
Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of combined spinal-epidm'al anesthesia and combined Midazolam used for laparoscopic gynecology Operation.Methods 500 patients of ASA grade Ⅰ~Ⅱundezgoing laparoseopic gynecology surgery were randomly devided into combined spinalepidural anesthesia group ( group CSEA , n = 250 ) and general anesthesia group ( group GA, n = 250 ),The variation of pert-anesthesia mean heart rate( HR ), respiration rate( RR ), arterial pressure( MAP ), pulse oxygen saturation ( SpO2 ) were tested and recorded. The wake time and the post-operative ( in 24hour ) complications were observed. Results Referring to all patients, there were not any significant differences in BP, HR, RR, SpO2 ( P〉 0.05 ).The wake time was signifieantly shorter in Group CSEA than in Group GA ( P〈 0.0l ), The incidence of postoperative complication ( nausea, vomiting, restlessness ) was significantly lower in Group CSEA than in Group GA ( P〈 0.05 ).Conclusion The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and combined Midazolam used for lapamscopic gynecology Operation is safe and feasible , and easier and more economical general anesthesia.
出处
《国际医药卫生导报》
2010年第7期779-782,共4页
International Medicine and Health Guidance News
基金
云浮市医学科学技术研究基金(20088005)
关键词
腰-硬联合麻醉
妇科腹腔镜手术
咪达唑仑
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
Midazolam, Laparoscopie gynecology Operation