摘要
目的:对比研究腹腔镜和开放手术行输尿管离断复位吻合术治疗腔静脉后输尿管的疗效。方法:回顾分析17例腹腔镜和10例开放手术行输尿管离断复位吻合术的临床资料,比较两种方法在手术时间、出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间、住院时间及并发症情况。结果:两组在手术时间、出血量和住院时间具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜治疗腔静脉后输尿管是可行与安全的,较开放手术具有微创、术中出血少、恢复快及住院时间短等优点,为腔静脉后输尿管患者提供了一种可供选择的有效方法。
Objective：Compared the treatment effects of abdominoscope and opening operation on postcaval ureter.Methods：Retrospectively analyzed 17 patients with abdominoscope and 10 patients with opening operation,and compared two methods in the operation time,blood loss,postoperative intestinal function recovery time,hospitalization and complications.Results：The difference on Operation time,blood loss,hospitalization were significance（P〈0.05）.Conclusions：The treatment of abdominoscope on postcaval ureter is feasibility and safety.Minimally invasive,less blood loss,quicker recovery,shorter hospitalization are the advantages of abdominoscope,and abdominoscope is a alternative effective operation to patients with postcaval ureter.
出处
《慢性病学杂志》
2010年第4期294-295,共2页
Chronic Pathematology Journal
