期刊文献+

早期PCI对急性心肌梗塞并发完全性右束支传导阻滞患者预后的影响 被引量:1

Influence of early percutaneous coronary intervention on the prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated complete right bundle branch block
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨早期PCI对急性心肌梗塞(AMI)并发完全性右束支传导阻滞(CRBBB)患者预后的影响。方法:回顾分析AMI并发CRBBB患者36例的临床资料,分为两组,早期行PCI的12例为观察组,未行PCI的24例为对照组,对两组患者的左室射血分数(LVEF)、心功能Killip分级、严重恶性心律失常发生率及住院病死率等临床资料进行对比性分析,并做统计学处理。结果:观察组的心功能Killip分级[(1.7±0.5)级∶(2.6±0.5)级]、严重恶性心律失常发生率(8.3%∶20.8%)及住院病死率(8.3%∶33.3%)均显著低于对照组(P<0.01),观察组的LVEF[(56.3±7.1)%∶(32.6±4.7)%]显著高于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:早期PCI可以改善急性心肌梗塞并发完全性右束支传导阻滞患者的预后。 Objective: To evaluate the influence of early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMD complicated by complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB). Methods: A total of 36 AMI cases combined with CRBBB were divided into two groups: 12 cases were treated by early PCI as observing group and 24 cases treated with routine therapy as control group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), Killip grade of heart function, incidence rate of severe arrhythmia and case fatality rate were compared and statistically analyzed. Results: The incidence rate of severe arrhytbmia (8. 3% vs. 20.8%) and case-fatality rate (8.3% vs. 33.3%), the rate of Killip grading ≥Ⅲ [(1.7±0.5) grade vs. (2.6±0.5) grade] were significantly lower in observing group than those in control group (P〈0.01 all). The LVEF after treated were significantly higher in observing group than those in control group [ (56.3±7.1)% vs. (32.6±4.7)%, P〈0.01]. Conclusion: In patients with acute myocardial infarction combined with complete right bundle branch block, the early percutaneous coronary intervention could improve their prognosis.
出处 《心血管康复医学杂志》 CAS 2010年第2期187-189,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 心肌梗塞 束支传导阻滞 预后 Angioplasty, percutaneous transluminal coronary Myocardial infarction Bundle branch block Prognosis Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

  • 1李国祥,李友元,邓洪波.急性心肌梗塞并发束支传导阻滞的临床特点[J].临床心血管病杂志,1997,13(2):113-114. 被引量:5
  • 2中华心血管病杂志编委会.急性心肌梗塞溶栓治疗参考方案[J].中华心血管病杂志,1991,19(3):137-137.
  • 3徐源叔,毛焕元,聂福鼎,等.急性心肌梗死合并传导阻滞82例临床分析[J].中华心血管杂志,1984,12(4):309.
  • 4Hod A,Goldboura AH,Behar S. Bundle branch block in acute inferior wall myocardia infarction [J]. Eur heart J, 1996,16 : 482.
  • 5Metgarejo MT, Galcera A J, Garcia AT, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristicsm, and prognostic significance of right bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction [J]. Circulation,1998,6:138-140.
  • 6Newby KW, Pisano A, Krocoff MH, et al. Incidence and clinical rehvane of the occurrence of bundle branch block in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy [J]. Circulation, 1997, 96:2426.
  • 7王思让.右束支传导阻滞症.见:黄宛主编.临床心电图学.第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.469-471.
  • 8Moreno A M, Tomas J G, Alberola A G, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic significance of right bundle branch block in acute myocardical infarction. Circulation,1997,96:1139-1144.
  • 9Ricou F, Nicod P, Gilpin E, et al. Influnce of right bundle branch block on short and long term survival after acute anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1991, 17:858-863.
  • 10Braunwald E. Heart Disease. Atrioventricular and intraventricular block. 5th ed.Harcourt: WB Saunders, 1997,1252-1252.

共引文献16

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部