期刊文献+

一种基于时态的扩展值辩论框架

A Temporal Extended Value Based Argumentation Framework
下载PDF
导出
摘要 时间是用来描述辩论过程以及辩论活动变化的一个重要因素,在辩论框架中加入时间因素是积极的。本文结合Dung的标准辩论框架以及Bench-Capon的基于值的辩论框架,提出了基于时态的扩展值辩论框架。首先分析了Dung的辩论框架以及Bench-Capon的值辩论框架在时态以及辩论值方面描述的局限性及需求,然后结合这些需求提出了基于时态的扩展值辩论框架,给出了完整的框架结构和语义描述,证明了基于时态的扩展值辩论框架满足Dung提出的标准辩论框架的一些基本定理。 Time is an important element of describing the process of argument and the changes of argument activities, and it is active to introduce time into argumentation framework. This paper proposes a temporal extended value based argu- mentation framework (TEVAF) based on Dung's standard argumentation framework (AF) and Bench-Capon's value based argumentation framework (VAF). First, we analyze their limitations in describing temporal and values which are related to arguments. Then, according to the requirements, TEVAF is proposed. We present a complete description of the structure of framework,and the semantics of the framework, and give the fundamental Lemma and some basic results shown by Dung' argumentation framework,which also hold for TEVAF.
出处 《计算机工程与科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第5期60-63,96,共5页 Computer Engineering & Science
关键词 时态 辩论 辩论框架 temporal argument argumentation framework
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bench-Capon T J M, Dunne P E. Argumentation in Artifieial Intelligence[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2007, 171 (10-15) 619-641.
  • 2Dung P M. On the Acceptability of Arguments and Its Fun damental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Program ruing and N-Person Games[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1995 77(2) :321-357.
  • 3Bench-Capon T J M. Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-Based Argumentation Framework[J]. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2003,13 (3) : 429-448.
  • 4Coste-Marquis S, Devred C, Marquis P. Symmetric Argumentation Framework[C]//Proc of Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainly, the 8th European Conf, 2005 : 317-328.
  • 5Modgil S. Hierarchical Argumentation[C]//Proc of the 10th European Conf on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 2006:319- 332.
  • 6Modgil S. Reasoning About Pre{erences in Argumentation Frameworks [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2009, 173 (9-10) : 901-934.
  • 7Kakas A, Moraitis P. Argumentation Based Decision Making for Autonomous Agents[C]//Proc of the 2nd Int'l Joint Conf on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2003: 883-890.
  • 8Modgil S. Nested Argumentation and Its Application to Decision Making over Actions[C]//Proc of the 2nd Int'l Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 2005: 57- 73.
  • 9伍京华,蒋国瑞,黄梯云.基于辩论的Agent谈判中威胁及其评价的形式化模型[J].计算机工程与应用,2007,43(15):205-207. 被引量:5
  • 10毛文燕.辩论协商中的逻辑论证框架[J].微电子学与计算机,2007,24(4):18-20. 被引量:2

二级参考文献25

  • 1黄河笑,覃征,郭俊文.一个改进的传统协商模型和算法[J].微电子学与计算机,2006,23(1):74-76. 被引量:2
  • 2[1]Dung P M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and N-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 1995, 77(3):321-357
  • 3[2]Dung P M. An argumentation-theoretic foundation for logic programming. Journal of Logic Programming, 1995, 22(2):151-177
  • 4[3]Bondarenko A, Dung P M, Kowalski R A, Toni F. An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 1997, 93(1):63-101
  • 5[4]Poole D L. A logical framework for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 1988, 36(1):27-47
  • 6[5]Poole D L. Explanation and prediction: An architecture for default and abductive reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 1989, 5(1):97-110
  • 7[6]Apt K R, Bol R. Logic programming and negation: A survey. Journal of Logic Programming, 1994, 19/20(1):9-71
  • 8[7]Kakas A C, Mamcarella P, Dung P M. The acceptability semantics for logic programs. In: Hentenrych P ed. ICLP-94, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994. 504-519
  • 9[8]Torres A. Negation as failure to support. In: Pereira L M, Nerode A eds. LPNMR-93, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993. 223-243
  • 10[9]Lloyd J. Foundations of Logic Programming. Springer-Verlag, 1987

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部