期刊文献+

基于模糊数据包络分析的产品质量功能展开 被引量:5

Quality Function Deployment Based on Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出一种用模糊DEA确定产品规划质量屋中各工程特性权重的方法。基于绿色设计的思想,除考虑顾客需求外,再考虑环境和成本的情况下,建立了质量屋。同时采用三角模糊数表示质量屋中的各种元素,提出用模糊DEA确定各工程特性权重。将每一个工程特性看作是一个决策单元,该工程特性与每一顾客需求的关联程度看作是输出指标,环境和成本看作是输入指标,决策单元的效率指标值体现了该工程特性的重要程度。最后,算例分析证明该方法的有效性和正确性。 A new method to rate the engineering characteristics in house of quality of product planning is proposed based on fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Based on the concept of green design, besides the customer needs, with respect to the environment and cost, the house of quality is established. At the same time, triangular fuzzy numbers are used to represent all the factors in HOQ. Then, a new method based on fuzzy DEA is used to rate the engineering characteristics, in which, each engineering characteristic is considered to be a decision making unit, the relationships between the engineering characteristic and all the customer needs are regarded as output factors, while effect on the environment and cost are regarded as input factors. The importance of the engineering characteristic is determined by the efficiency score. Finally, a numeric example is used to illustrate the validity and correctness of the method.
出处 《组合机床与自动化加工技术》 北大核心 2010年第4期26-30,共5页 Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique
基金 国家自然科学基金(70571041) 山东省自然科学基金(ZR2009GL006)
关键词 质量功能展开 质量屋 模糊数据包络分析 工程特性重要度 quality function deployment house of quality Fuzzy DEA rating the engineering characteristics
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Herrmann A,Huber F,Braunstein C.Market-driven and service design:Bridging the gap between customer need,quality management and customer satisfaction[J].Int J Production Economics,2000,66:77-96.
  • 2Hauser John R,Don Clausing.The House of quality[J].Harvard Business Review,1988,66(3):63-73.
  • 3沈维蕾,谢峰,柴畅.基于QFD的产品设计开发技术的研究[J].组合机床与自动化加工技术,2004(4):15-16. 被引量:4
  • 4陈以增,任朝辉,唐加福,任立义.基于QFD的产品多目标规划模型[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2003,24(1):46-49. 被引量:27
  • 5Tacho P K,Jae K.Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality.Journal of Operation Management,1998,16:569-581.
  • 6Chen Yi-zeng,Richard Y.K.Fung,Tang Jia-fu.Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,174(3,1):1553-1566.
  • 7Tang Jia-fu,Richard Y.K.Fung,et al.A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration.Computer & Operations Research,2002,29(11):1447-1463.
  • 8Jürgen Bode,Richard Y.K.Fung.Cost engineering with quality function deployment[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,1998,35(3-4):587-590.
  • 9Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,Jiang Yunfeng,Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis[J].Omega,The International Journal of Management Science(2007),doi:10.1016/j.omega.2007.12.003.
  • 10Jaroslav Ramík,Josef ímnek.Inequality relation between fuzzy numbers and its use in fuzzy optimization[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1985,16(2):123-138.

二级参考文献13

  • 1张公绪.新编质量管理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1994..
  • 2Tang J, Richard Y K, Xu B,et al. A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration[J]. Computer & Operations Research, 2002,29(11):1447-1463.
  • 3Variaktarakis G L. Optimization tools for design and marketing of new/improved products using the house of quality[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 1999,(17):645-663.
  • 4Fung RYK,Tang J,Tu Y et al. Product design resources optimazation using a non-liear fuzzy quality function deployment model[J]. INT J PROD RES, 2002,40(3):585-599.
  • 5Park T, Kim K J. Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 1998,(16):569-581.
  • 6Wassermann G S. On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process[J]. IEE Transactions, 1993,25(3):59-65.
  • 7Kim K J,Moskowitz H. Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2000,(121):504-518.
  • 8Armacost R L,Componation P J,Michael A,et al. An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: an industrialized housing application[J]. IEE Trans, 1994,26(4):72-79.
  • 9Hauser J R,Clausing D. The house of quality[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1988,(5-6):63-73.
  • 10Yen K K, Ghoshray S, Roig G. A linear regression model using triangular fuzzy number coefficients[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1999,(106):167-177.

共引文献29

同被引文献99

  • 1王美清,唐晓青.一种面向产品规划过程的组合质量屋[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2004,30(7):652-656. 被引量:36
  • 2陈畴镛,鄢冰文.信息共享对供应链合作价值的影响[J].杭州电子科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,25(6):1-5. 被引量:2
  • 3韩刚,覃正.信息生态链:一个理论框架[J].情报理论与实践,2007,30(1):18-20. 被引量:155
  • 4王晶,李伊岚,孙海燕.供应链信息管理研究现状及展望[J].管理学报,2007,4(2):235-242. 被引量:20
  • 5任朝晖,宋乃慧,李小彭,闻邦椿,陈以增.质量功能配置方法中模糊信息建模[J].机械工程学报,2007,43(5):64-68. 被引量:11
  • 6LI Yantai, TANG Jiafu, CHIN Kwaisang. Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 131(2): 575-586.
  • 7SENER Z, KARSAK E E. A decision model for setting target levels in quality fimction deployment using nonlinear programming-based fuzzy regression and optimization [J]. International Journal of AdvancedManufacturing Technology, 2010, 48(9-12): 1173-1184.
  • 8LEE A H I, KANG H Y, YANG C Y, et al. An evaluation framework for product planning using FANP, QFD and multi-choice goal programming[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2010, 48(13): 3977-3997.
  • 9HOYLE C J, CHEN Wei. Product attribute function deployment(PAFD) for decision-based conceptual design [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2009, 56(2): 271-284.
  • 10SAKAO T. A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45(18-19): 4143-4162.

引证文献5

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部