期刊文献+

终极控制权、现金流权与盈余质量——来自我国A股上市公司的实证研究 被引量:5

Ultimate Control Rights,Cash Flow Rights and Earnings Quality——Empirical Study from Chinese A-share Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以2004—2007年我国A股上市公司为样本,实证研究了终极控制权、现金流权与盈余质量的关系。研究结果表明,股权分置改革之前,现金流权与盈余质量显著负相关;股权分置改革之后,现就流权与盈余质量显著正相关。终极控制权与盈余质量变现为显著的负相关。两权分离度和控制链层级在总体上显著降低了盈余质量,国有终极控制的样本公司的盈余质量好于私人终极控制的样本公司。本文的研究结论为设计和制定上市公司信息披露制度提供了有价值的经验证据,同时也证明了股权分置改革取得了预期的效果,一定程度上提高了中小股东的受保护程度。 This paper made empirical research for the relationship between ultimate control fights, cash flow rights and earnings quality using Chinese A- share list companies from 2004 to 2007 as samples. The results showed that a significant negative correlation was taken on between cash flow rights and earnings quality before non - tradable - share reform, and a significant positive correlation after non- tradable-share reform. Ultimate control rights and earnings quality is generally manifested as a significant negative correlation. Separation of the two fights and the hierarchy of controlling chain generally and significantly reduce the quality of earnings, and the earnings quality of the state - owned ultimate control companies is better than that of private ultimate control companies. This conclusion provides valuable empirical evidence for the design and formulation of information disclosure system of listed companies, and it also shows that the non - tradable - share reform has achieved the desired results; the level of protection for small and medium shareholders has been improved to some extent.
出处 《广西财经学院学报》 2010年第2期60-66,共7页 Journal of Guangxi University of Finance and Economics
关键词 终极控制权 现金流权 两权分离度 盈余质量 ultimate control fights cash flow fights separation of the two rights earnings quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献74

  • 1王保树,杨继.论股份公司控制股东的义务与责任[J].法学,2002(2):60-68. 被引量:70
  • 2吴敬琏.什么是现代企业制度[J].改革,1994(1):17-34. 被引量:27
  • 3张维迎.所有制、治理结构及委托—代理关系———兼评崔之元和周其仁的一些观点[J].经济研究,1996,31(9):3-15. 被引量:1549
  • 4翁淑育.[D].辅仁大学金融研究所,2000,6月.
  • 5巴泽尔.《产权的经济分析》中译本[M].上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1999..
  • 6Bai, C E , Liu, Q , Lu, J , Song, F M , and Zhang, J x, 2002, Corporate Governance and Finn Valuations in China, The University of Hong Kong, Working paper, November.
  • 7Bebchuk, L, Kraakman, R, and Triantis, G., 1998, Stock Pyramids, Crass-ownership and Dual Equity: the Creation and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash Flow Rights, Harvard Law School Working paper.
  • 8Berghe, L A A V , and Carchon, S , 2002, Corporate Govemance Practices in Flemish Family Businesses, Vleick Leuven Gent Management School Working paper.
  • 9Chami, R, 1999, What' s Different About Family Business? NBER Working paper, October.
  • 10Claessens, S, Djankov, S., and Lang, L H P, 2000, The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations, Journal of Financial Economies, 58: 81-112.

共引文献1142

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部