论国际刑事法院管辖权与国家主权的冲突——以巴希尔逮捕令案为视角

On Conflict of International Criminal Court Jurisdiction and National Sovereignty——Taking the Bashir Arrest Case as the Angle of View

依据《罗马公约》设立的国际刑事法院,是当代国际法制从威斯特伐利亚法治模式向自由法治模式转变的重要标志,转变的同时有关国际刑事法院管辖权规则对传统国家主权理论提出了挑战,引起国际社会对国家主权问题的审视。国际刑事法院设立以来,对非缔约国主权的影响问题、与国内普遍管辖权的协调问题、对刑事豁免权的态度问题凸显,这也是中美等大国拒绝加入《罗马公约》的关键所在。本文立足国际刑事法院管辖权与国家主权冲突,以具体的案例为证,揭开问题的实质。

The International Criminal Court founded by the Roman Document, is the important symbol that the contemporary international legal system transformed from the Wisterfaliya pattern to the free government by law pattern, at the same time the related international criminal court jurisdiction rule presented the challenge to the tradition national sovereignty theory, caused the carefull examination in international society on national sovereignty issues. Since the International criminal court has set up, people give highlights to the influence on non - signatory state sovereignty, its coordination with the domestic universal jurisdiction, and manner to the criminal right of immunity, this is the key cause that great nations like China and the USA has refused to join the Roman document. Based on the conflict of the International Criminal Court jurisdiction and the national sovereignty, this article will open the essence taking the concrete case as the modle.