期刊文献+

连续股神经阻滞用于老年全膝置换术患者术后自控镇痛的临床观察 被引量:1

Observation on pain control with continuous femoral nerve block after knee replacement surgery in old patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨患者自控连续股神经镇痛用于老年全膝置换术的可行性.方法 单侧全膝关节置换术患者40例随机分为两组:患者自控连续股神经镇痛组(F组)与患者自控连续硬膜外镇痛组(E组),每组各20例.腰麻联合硬膜外阻滞下手术.F组在手术结束后行股神经穿刺,术后行自控镇痛.两组镇痛泵的配方如下:F组为罗哌卡因600 mg加生理盐水稀释至300 ml,输注速度为6 ml/h;E组为罗哌卡因225 mg,稀释至100 ml,输注速度为2 ml/h.观察术后各时间点血液动力学变化、VAS评分以及不良反应的发生率.结果 术后两组患者疼痛评分无统计学差异,E组术后血液动力学波动较明显且不良反应的发生率较高(P〈0.05).结论 股神经阻滞用于术后患者自控镇痛对于老年全膝置换术患者能提供有效的镇痛效果,且可以显著提高患者的安全性,减少不良反应. Objective To investigate the possibility of patient-controlled analgesia with continuous femoral nerve block for knee replacement surgery. Methods Forty patients undergoing one knee joint replacement operation , were divided randomly into two groups with twenty patiensts in each, group F: patient-controlled femoral nerve analgesia (PCFA); group E: patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). All operations were operated under subarachnoid block combined with epidural anesthesia. After operation, femoral nerve blockade was operated and then an analgesia pump was connected to the catheter in F group. The anesthetic mixture used in the two groups was as following: ropivacaine 600mg was diluted with NS to 300ml in group F and infused by 6ml/h; In group E, ropivacaine 225mg was diluted with NS to 100ml and infused by 2 ml/h. The change of hemodynamics, VAS, as well as the incidences of adverse reactions at different time points were observed. Results There was no statistical difference between the two groups in VAS(P〉0.05). But in group E,the fluctuation of hemodynamics was more obvious and the incidences of adverse reactions were higher than that in group F(P〈0.05). Conclusion PCFA can provide an effective analgesic for olderly patients undergoing one knee joint replacement operation,improve patients' safety and reduce the incidence rate of adverse reactions.
出处 《实用疼痛学杂志》 2010年第1期24-26,共3页 Pain Clinic Journal
关键词 罗哌卡因 股神经 神经传导阻滞 关节成形术 置换 镇痛 患者控制 Ropivacaine Femoral Nerve Nerve Block Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1陈晓云,吴新民.硬膜外阻滞对胸科手术患者血液流变学及凝血功能的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(6):410-414. 被引量:47
  • 2吴景明,白波,余楠生,卢伟杰.人工膝关节置换术后的早期康复[J].现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2004,10(6):492-493. 被引量:11
  • 3林惠华,张晓光,牛捷平,孙晓雄.不同浓度罗哌卡因用于腋路臂丛神经阻滞的研究[J].中国实用手外科杂志,2001,15(3):153-155. 被引量:17
  • 4Davis FM, Medrmott E, Hickton C, et al. Influence of spinal and general anaesthesia on haemostasis during total hip arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth,1987,59: 561-571.
  • 5Mann C, Pouze Ratte Y, Boccara G, et al. Comparision of intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia in the elderly after major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesiology, 2000,92: 433-441.
  • 6Feldman HS, Arthur GR, Covino BG. Comparative systemic toxicity of convulsant and supraconvulsant doses of intravenous ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and lidocaine in the conscious dog.Anesth Analg, 1989; 69:794
  • 7Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, et al. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg, 1989;69:563
  • 8Knudsen K, Beckman, Suurkula M, et al. Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of infusions of ropivacaine during interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg, 1997; 78:507
  • 9Rutten AJ, Nancarrow C, Mather LE, et al. Hemodynamic and central nervous system effects of intravenous bolus doses of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine in sheep. Anesth Analg, 1989; 69:291
  • 10Bader AM, Datta S, Flanagan H, et al. Comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine-induced conduction blockade in the isolated rabbit vagus nerve. Anesth Analg, 1989; 68:724

共引文献66

同被引文献7

  • 1Shanthanna H, Huilgol M, Manivackam VK, et al. Compara- tive study of ultrasound- guided continuous femoral nerve blockade with continuous epidural analgesia for pain relief fol- lowing total knee replacement. Indian J Anaesth, 2012, 56 (3) : 270-275.
  • 2BaranovieS, Maldini B, MilosevieM, et al. Peripheral regional analgesia with femoral catheter versus intravenous patient con trolled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. Coll Antropol, 2011, 35(4):1209-1214.
  • 3Ng FY, Chiu KY, Yan CH, et al. Continuous femoral nerve block versus patient-controlled analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2012, 20(1) : 23- 26.
  • 4Morau D, Lopez S, Biboulet P, et al. Comparison of continu- ous 3-in-1 and fascia Iliaca compartment blocks for postopera- tive analgesia: feasibility, catheter migration, distribution of sensory block, and analgesic efficacy. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2003, 28(4): 309-314.
  • 5Capdevila X, Biboulet P, Boureqba M, et al. Comparison of the three- in-one and fascia iliaca compartment blocks in adults clinical and radiographic analysis. Anesth Anag, 1998, 86(5): 1039-1044.
  • 6Gallardo J, Contreras-Dominquez V, Beqazo H, et al. Effica- cy of the fascia iliaca compartment block vs continuous epidural infusion for analgesia following total knee replacement surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2011, 58(8):493-498.
  • 7Crozier TA, Muller JE, Quittkat D, et al. Effect of anaesthe- sia on the cytokine responses to abdominal surgery. Br J An- aesth, 1994, 72(3)..280-285.

引证文献1

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部