期刊文献+

Ranking Agricultural Sub-basins for Environmental Protection 被引量:1

Ranking Agricultural Sub-basins for Environmental Protection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Reconstructing long-term vegetation buffers along streams in agricultural landscapes has become a common environmental restoration strategy for improving water quality and wildlife habitat connectivity.This article developed a linear weighted model to rank the priority of agricultural sub-basins for the establishment of vegetative buffers.The method was applied to an agricultural watershed of 146 km2 in Ontario,Canada.The watershed was divided into 11 sub-basins as basic decision units.In each subbasin,four stream buffer schemes with widths of 5,10,15 and 20m were generated.For each buffer,three benefit-cost attributes of reconstructing vegetation cover were estimated,which include acreage per dollar,sediment abatement per dollar and habitat benefit per dollar.These attributes were first normalized using a linear normalization approach to eliminate the effects across different units.The normalized attributes were then integrated using a simple additive weighting method to rank the 11 sub-basins for prioritizing spatial restoration action.A sensitivity analysis was also conducted to observe the impact of a change in attribute weights on the management decisions.The results suggest that vegetation buffers reconstructed for achieving the water quality goal are not effective in improving habitat connectivity and vice versa. Reconstructing long-term vegetation buffers along streams in agricultural landscapes has become a common environmental restoration strategy for improving water quality and wildlife habitat connectivity.This article developed a linear weighted model to rank the priority of agricultural sub-basins for the establishment of vegetative buffers.The method was applied to an agricultural watershed of 146 km2 in Ontario,Canada.The watershed was divided into 11 sub-basins as basic decision units.In each subbasin,four stream buffer schemes with widths of 5,10,15 and 20m were generated.For each buffer,three benefit-cost attributes of reconstructing vegetation cover were estimated,which include acreage per dollar,sediment abatement per dollar and habitat benefit per dollar.These attributes were first normalized using a linear normalization approach to eliminate the effects across different units.The normalized attributes were then integrated using a simple additive weighting method to rank the 11 sub-basins for prioritizing spatial restoration action.A sensitivity analysis was also conducted to observe the impact of a change in attribute weights on the management decisions.The results suggest that vegetation buffers reconstructed for achieving the water quality goal are not effective in improving habitat connectivity and vice versa.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment》 2010年第1期32-37,共6页 中国人口·资源与环境(英文版)
基金 supported by "SUST Spring Bud" Project (Grant no.2008AZZ110) National Key Technology R&D Program of China project (Grant no.2006BAJ15B02)
关键词 watershed management riparian buffer cost-benefit analysis landscape restoration 农业景观 子流域 环境保护 属性权重 植被覆盖 水质目标 野生动植物 缓冲区
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1J. M. Kelly,J. L. Kovar,R. Sokolowsky,T. B. Moorman.Phosphorus uptake during four years by different vegetative cover types in a riparian buffer[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems . 2007 (3)
  • 2Robert C. Wissmar,W. Nicholas Beer,Raymond K. Timm.Spatially explicit estimates of erosion-risk indices and variable riparian buffer widths in watersheds[J]. Aquatic Sciences . 2004 (4)
  • 3Roy Boyd,Noel D. Uri.A Note on the Use of Conservation Practices in U.S. Agriculture[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment . 2001 (2)
  • 4DMTI Spatial Inc.User Manual: CanMap RouteLogistics. . 2004
  • 5Feather P,Hellerstein D,Hansen L.Economic valuation of en-vironmental benefits and the targeting of conservation programs: the case of the CRP. Resource Economics Divi-sion, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agricul-ture, Agricultural Economic Report no 778 . 1999
  • 6Gorsevski P V,Boll J,Gomezdelcampo E, et al.Dynamic ripar-ian buffer widths from potential non-point source pollution areas in forested watersheds. Forest Ecology and Management . 2008
  • 7Shearer K S,Xiang W N.The characteristics of riparian buffer studies. Journal of Environmental Informatics . 2007
  • 8Smith T A,Osmond D L,Moorman C E, et al.Effect of vegeta-tion management on bird habitat in riparian buffer zones. South-eastern Naturalist . 2008
  • 9Vennix S,Northcott W.Prioritizing vegetative buffer strip placement in an agricultural watershed. Journal of Spatial Hydrol-ogy . 2004
  • 10Adriaensen F,Chardon JP,Blust GD,et al.The application of ’least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning . 2003

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部