期刊文献+

后路椎间融合钉棒系统内固定在腰椎椎间盘突出症术后复发中的应用 被引量:6

Posterior interbody fusion combined with intervertebral fixation in treatment of postoperative recurrence of lumbar disc herniation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腰椎椎间盘突出症术后复发再次手术中应用椎间融合器后路置入并椎弓根螺钉系统的适应证及疗效。方法2005年12月~2008年12月,应用后路椎间融合器(PLIF)并椎弓根螺钉系统治疗术后复发的腰椎椎间盘突出症患者12例,其中10例为同侧复发,2例为对侧复发。应用单侧椎弓根钉棒系统并单枚斜向椎间融合器治疗4例,双侧钉棒系统并双融合器治疗8例,根据手术前后的X线片、CT检查和JOA评分,判定该术式的融合率和临床效果。结果随访8~24个月,平均16个月,经X线及CT检查,融合率为96.2%;按JOA评分计算的术后综合平均改善率为91.5%。结论在腰椎椎间盘突出症术后复发再次手术中应用后路椎间融合器(PLIF)并椎弓根螺钉系统能尽可能多地保留脊柱后部结构,增加了融合术后的椎节即刻稳定性,恢复和维持椎间高度,取得了高融合率和高综合改善率的双重效果。其中单侧固定单枚融合器疗效具有创伤少的优点,与双侧固定双枚融合器疗效相当,但需严格掌握手术指征。 Objective To investigate the indications and the efficacy of the posterior interbody fusion combined with intervertebral fixation in treatment of postoperative recurrence of lumbar disc herniation.Methods From December 2005 to December 2008,posterior interbody fusion combined with intervertebral fixation were performed in 12 patients with postoperative recurrence of lumbar disc herniation,in whom 10 cases of ipsilateral recurrence and 2 cases of contralateral recurrence.In all 12 cases,4 patients were treated with unilateral pedicle screw-rod system and single diagonal interbody fusion,while 8 patients with bilateral screw-rod system and dual-fusion.The fusion rate and clinical efficacy were evaluated according to postoperative X-rays,CT and JOA score.Results The period of follow-up ranged from 8 to 24 months with an average time of 16 months.The fusion rate was 96.2% according to the postoperative X-rays and CT examination.The postoperative improvement rate of JOA score was 91.5%.Conclusion In the treatment of patients with postoperative recurrence of lumbar disc herniation,posterior interbody fusion combined with intervertebral fixation can retain the rear of the structure of the vetebrae as much as possible,increase the initial stability after fusion,restore and maintain the intervertebral height,and elevate both the fusion rate and the improvement rate.The treatment of unilateral pedicle screw-rod system and single diagonal interbody fusion with less trauma can obtain nearly equivalent efficacy as the treatment of bilateral screw-rod system and dual-fusion,but the surgical indications must be obedienced strictly.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2010年第1期20-22,共3页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 腰椎 椎间盘移位 复发 内固定器 脊柱融合术 Lumbar vertebrae Intervertebral disk displacement Recurrence Internal fixators Spinal fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1胡有谷.腰椎间盘突出症[M].第三版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2004,361-362
  • 2Postacchini F.Lumber disc herniation[M].New York:Springe,1999:592-599.
  • 3Herkowitz HN,Dovorak J,Bell GR,et al.The Lumber Spine[M].3rd ed.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2006:445-451.
  • 4Cinotti G,Gumina S,Giannicola G,et al.Contralateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation.Results of discectomy compared with those in primary herniation[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1999,24(8):800-806.
  • 5Jonsson B,Stromqvist B.Repeat decompression of lumbar nerve roots.A prospective two-year evaluation[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,1993,75(6):894-897.
  • 6Suk KS,Lee HM,Moon SH,et al.Recurrent lumbar disc herniation:results of operative management[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2001,26(6):672-676.
  • 7Wong DA,Transfeldt E.Macnab's Backache[M].4th ed.Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams and Wilkins,2007:206-215.
  • 8Vaccaro AR,Baron EM.Operative Techniques:Spine Surgery[M].Elsevier inc,2009:293-300.

共引文献2

同被引文献63

  • 1昌耘冰,徐达传,尹庆水,赵卫东,艾福志,黄文华.三种椎间融合器对腰椎节段即时稳定性影响的三维运动研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(12):1380-1383. 被引量:7
  • 2胥少汀.关于腰椎疾患行融合与内固定的管见[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(7):394-396. 被引量:36
  • 3McAfee PC, Farey ID, Sutterlin CE, et al. 1989 Volvo Award in basic science. Device-related osteoporosis with spina| instrumen- tation[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1989, 14(9) :919-926.
  • 4McAfee PC, Farey ID, Sutterlin CE, et al. The effect of spinal implant rigidity on vertebral bone density. A canine model[ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1991, 16(6 Suppl) :S190-197.
  • 5Chow JH, Chan CC. Validation of 1he Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index[J]. Work, 2005, 25(4) :307 -314.
  • 6Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain[J].Lancet, 1974, 2 (7889) : 1127 - 1131.
  • 7Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S. Degenerative lumbar spon- dylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993 [ J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1994, 19(20 Suppl) :S2256-2265.
  • 8Zdebliek TA. A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion, Preliminary results [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) , 1993, 18 ( 8 ) : 983-991.
  • 9Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylo- listhesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) , 1997, 22(24) :2807-2812.
  • 10Fischgrund JS. The argument for instrumented decompressive pos- terolateral fusion for patients with degenerative spnndylolisthesis and spinal stenosis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29(2) :173-174.

引证文献6

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部