期刊文献+

蛛网膜下腔阻滞加硬膜外阻滞镇痛对产程、分娩方式及母儿预后的影响 被引量:4

Influence of combined spinal epidural analgesia and epidural analgesia on the progress of labor,delivery way and mothers and infants outcome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨蛛网膜下腔阻滞(腰麻)-硬膜外联合麻醉和产妇自控硬膜外镇痛(CSEA+PCEA)在分娩镇痛过程中对产程进展、分娩方式及母儿预后的影响。方法回顾性分析406例初产妇病历资料,观察组(CSEA+PCEA)共135例,对照组(产程中未采用任何镇痛措施)282例,比较两组产程经过、分娩方式及母儿结局。结果观察组活跃期及第二产程时间分别为(223.33±105.84)min、(58.74±33.15)min,对照组为(176.14±99.66)min、(46.71±33.69)min,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组出现产程中需缩宫素加强宫缩及活跃期停滞的发生率分别为60.00%、6.67%,对照组为27.68%、2.34%,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.001、P=0.034);观察组剖宫产率(11.85%)、产程中尿潴留的发生率(55.56%)较对照组(分别为5.54%、33.58%)比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.024、P<0.001);难产手术(产钳助产+剖宫产)、羊水改变、第三产程、产后出血、新生儿Apgar评分、新生儿窒息及产后尿潴留的发生率两组比较差异均无统计学意义。结论CSEA+PCEA镇痛对产程进展存在一定的影响,但是对分娩结局及母儿的近期预后无明显影响。 Objective To study whether combined spinal-epidural analgesia(CSEA)and patient-control epidural analgesia(PCEA)has influence on labor progress,delivery way and mothers and infants outcome.Methods Cases data of 406 healthy nulliparas were retrospectively analyzed,study group(345 cases)accepted CSEA+PCEA and control group(282 cases)without CSEA+PCEA,to compare the labor progress,delivery way and the maternal and fetal outcome.Results The duration of active phase in the first stage and the second stage in the study group[(223.33 ±105.85)min,(59.29 ±33.155)min]were significantly longer than that of control group[(176.14±99.66)min,(46.71±33.69)]min(P〈0.01),the rate of augmentation by oxytocin and the occurrence of arrested active phase in the study group(60.00%,6.67%)were significantly higher than that of control group(27.68%,2.34%)(P〈0.001,P=0.034),The rate of cesarean section and urinary retention during labor in the study group(11.85%、55.56%)were significantly higher than that of control group(5.54%,33.58%)(P=0.024,P〈0.001),No statistical difference was found between the two groups in the rate of dystocia(forceps delivery and cesarean section),amniotic fluid changes,the duration of the third stage,the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage,the Apgar score of newborn,the occurrence of neonatal asphyxia and postpartum urine retention.Conclusion CSEA+PCEA had adverse effect on labor progress,but it has no evident adverse effect on delivery way and mothers and infants outcome in the near future.
出处 《中国实用医药》 2010年第11期6-8,共3页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉 镇痛 产程 妊娠结局 Spinal-epidural analgesia Analgesia Labor Pregnancy outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Holger KE, Ellice SL, William RC. Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med ,2003,348:319-332.
  • 2金胜威,徐旭仲,苏尔瞻,赵宇,陈素华,许峰.罗哌卡因腰麻复合硬膜外阻滞麻醉用于分娩镇痛对初产妇产程的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,2002,37(3):171-172. 被引量:26
  • 3张素云,吴连方,范玲,金有慧,刘维靖,韩小英,胡绥苏,王稚晖,田春华,刘亚菲,赵天卫.针药结合分娩镇痛的临床研究[J].中华围产医学杂志,2003,6(1):6-9. 被引量:22
  • 4Zi Tian Fan, Xue Lian Gao, Hui Xia Yang. Popularizing labor analgesia in China. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ( 2007 ) ,98 : 205-207.
  • 5Serene Leo, Alex Tiong-Heng Sia. Maintaining labour epidural analgesia:what is the best option Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 2008,21:263-269.
  • 6Rachel E Collis. Analgesia in labour: induction and maintenance. Anaesthesia and intensive care medicine, (2007) 8:7.
  • 7Eltzschig HK, Lieerman ES, Camann WR. Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med ,2003,348:319-332.
  • 8Leighton BL, Halpren SH. The effect s of epidural analgesia onlabor, maternal,and neonatal outcomes:A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,186 : S69277.
  • 9ACOG. Technical Bulletin, 1996 (225) :633-638.
  • 10Anim-Somuab M, Smyth RMD, Howell CJ. Epidural versus nonepidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. Art. No. : CD000331. DOI: 10. 1002/14651858. CD000331. pub2.

二级参考文献36

  • 1[1]Holger KE, Ellice SL, William RC. Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med,2003,348:319-332.
  • 2[2]Babara LLeighton, Stephen HH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,186:S69-77.
  • 3[3]Alexander JM, Sharma SK, McIntire DD, et al. Epidural analgesia lengthens the Friedman active phase of labor. Obstet Gynecol,2002,100:46-50.
  • 4[4]Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,187:824-828.
  • 5[7]Theodore RM,David MK. Labor pain management in United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,186:S173-180.
  • 6曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M](第1版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.474-476.
  • 7Lawrenca C, Brad T, Sanjay C,et al. Is combined spinal-epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesiol, 1999,91:920-925.
  • 8James A, Daniel H, Rene M, et al. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized controlled prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1993,169:851-858.
  • 9Halpern SH, Leighton BL, Ohlsson A, et al. Effect of parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis. JAMA, 1998,280:2105-2110.
  • 10Cutbush CM, McDonough JP, Clark K, et al. The effect of intrathecaj and epidural narcotic analgesia on the length of labor. CRNA, 1998, 9:106-112.

共引文献279

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部