摘要
目的:研究米格列奈钙胶囊(受试制剂)与米格列奈钙片(参比制剂)的生物等效性。方法:20名健康受试者自身交叉单剂量口服米格列奈钙胶囊与米格列奈钙片,采用液相色谱-质谱法测定血浆药物浓度,计算药动学参数,以方差分析与单向t检验进行统计分析。结果:受试制剂和参比制剂的t1/2分别为(1.2±0.3)h和(1.1±0.3)h,tmax分别为(0.6±0.2)h和(0.5±0.3)h,Cmax分别为(838.4±226.6)μg.L-1和(947.3±230.9)μg.L-1,AUC0-12分别为(1 354.0±308.4)ng.h.mL-1和(1 298.8±376.4)ng.h.mL-1。米格列奈钙胶囊相对于片剂的生物利用度为(108.5±24.2)%。结论:2种制剂具有生物等效性。
ORJECTIVE To study the relative bioequivalence of mitiglinide capsule and mitiglinide tablet in Chinese healthy volunteers. METItODS A single dose of 10 mg mitiglinide was randomly administrated to 20 healthy volunteers in two-way cross-over design. Plasma concentration of mitiglinide was determined by LC-MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. The bioequivalence of the two preparations was calculated by analysis variance and two one side t-test. RESULTS After oral administration, the main pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference preparations were as follows: t1/2 (1.2± 0. 3) h and(1. 1 ±0.3)h, tmax(0.6± 0.2 )h and (0. 5± 0.3)h,Cmax(838.4±226.6)μg.L-1 and(947.3± 230.9)μg.L-1,AUC0-12 ( 1 354. 0 ± 308. 4) ng. h. mL-1 and( 1 298. 8 ± 376. 4) ng. h. mL -1. CONCLUSION The two preparation were bioequivalent.
出处
《中国医院药学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第7期540-543,共4页
Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy