期刊文献+

FOLFOX4方案和ECF方案治疗老年晚期胃癌的疗效比较 被引量:7

Comparison of FOLFOX4 regimen and ECF regimen on advanced gastric carcinoma in elderly patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较FOLFOX4方案和ECF方案治疗老年晚期胃癌的疗效及不良反应。方法:将56例经病理确诊的老年晚期胃癌患者随机分为两组。A组29例,采用FOLFOX4方案化疗:草酸铂75mg/m2,静脉滴注2h,d1;亚叶酸钙200mg/m2,静脉滴注2h,d1-2;氟尿嘧啶400mg/m2,静脉推注,d1、d2,氟尿嘧啶600mg/m2,持续静脉泵输注22h,d1-2。每2周为1周期。B组27例,采用ECF方案化疗:表柔比星45mg/m2,静脉推注,d1;氟尿嘧啶675mg/m2,持续静脉泵输注120h;顺铂20mg/m2,静脉滴注,d1-3。每3周为1周期。对两组的近期疗效、疾病进展时间、总生存期、生活质量改善情况、不良反应进行比较。结果:A组和B组的有效率分别为41.4%(12/29)和44.4%(12/27),无显著性差异(P=0.8168)。A组和B组的中位疾病进展时间4.6月(1-15月),4.8个月(1-14月)(P=0.8899);中位生存时间7月(2-16月),6.9月(2-16月)(P=0.2905)。A组和B组的生活质量改善为65.5%(19/29)和37.0%(10/27)有显著性差异(P=0.0331);两组主要不良反应白细胞减少、腹泻、口腔炎、神经毒性、脱发、心脏毒性等指标的差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:FOLFOX4方案和ECF方案治疗老年晚期胃癌近期疗效较好,在生活质量改善以及不良反应方面,FOL-FOX4方案优于ECF方案,具有更好的耐受性。 Objective:To compare the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFOX4 regimen and ECF regimen on advanced gastric carcinoma(AGG) in elderly patients.Methods:Fifty six patients with AGG were divided into two groups randomly,29 patients in group A treated with FOLFOX4 regimen:L-OHP(75mg/m^2 iv 2h d1) were given first,CF(200mg/m^2 iv 2h d1-2) followed by 5-FU(400mg/m^2 iv d1-2) and 5-FU(600mg/m^2 civ 22h d1-2) were given,repeated every 14 days;27 patients in group B treated with ECF regimen:EPI(45mg/m^2 iv d1),5-FU(675mg/m^2 civ 120h) and DDP(20mg/m^2 iv d1-3) were given,repeated every 21 days.The efficacy,time to disease progression(TTP),overall survival(OS),improvement of QOL and toxicity of the two regimens were analyzed.Results:The response rate(RR) of group A and B were 41.4%(12/29)and 44.4%(12/27),respectively.There was no significant deference(P=0.8168).The median TTP was 4.6months in group A and 4.8 months in group B(P=0.8899).The median survival time was 7 months in group A and 6.9 months in group B(P=0.2905).The improvement of QOL of A and B were 65.5%(19/29) and 37%(10/27),respectively,(P=0.0331).Major side effect of the two groups had significant deference(P〈0.05).Conclusion:Both FOLFOX4 and ECF regimens were effective in treating advanced gastric cancer in elderly patients.FOLFOX4 regimen is better than ECF regimen on the improvement of QOL and toxicities survivability.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2010年第4期752-754,共3页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 老年晚期胃癌 化学治疗 FOLFOX4方案 ECF方案 advanced gastric carcinoma chemotherapy FOLFOX4 regimen ECF regimen
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Burris HA 3rd,Moore MJ,Andersen J,et al.Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer:a randomized trial[J].J Clin Oncol,1997,15(6):2403-2413.
  • 2Murad AM,Santiago FF,Petroianu A,et al.Modified therapy with 5-fluorouracil,doxorubicin,and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer[J].Cancer,1993,72:37-41.
  • 3Pyrhonen S,Kuitunen T,Nyandoto P,et al.Randomised comparison of fluorouracil,epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer[J].Br J Cancer,1995,71:587-591.
  • 4Ohtsu A,Shimada Y,Shirao K,et al.Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable,advanced gastric cancer:The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205)[J].J Clin Oncol,2003,21:54-59.
  • 5Waters JS,Norman A,Cunningham D,et al.Long-term survival after epirubicin,cisplatin and fluorouracil for gastric cancer:results of a randomized trial[J].Br J Cancer,1999,80:269-272.
  • 6江波,赵金奇,刘坤,涂长玲.FOLFOX4方案和ECF方案治疗晚期胃癌的比较[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2008,13(1):43-45. 被引量:10
  • 7Lim JY,Cho JY,Oh KJ,et al.Oxaliplatin combined with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma[J].Chemotherapy,2009,55(4):200-206.
  • 8吴芳,张弘纲,冉飞武,张湘茹,石远凯.FOLFOX4方案和DP(O)F方案一线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效分析[J].癌症,2008,27(4):413-417. 被引量:24
  • 9肖卫.FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2008,16(2):241-243. 被引量:22
  • 10Trumper M,Ross PJ,Cunningham D,et al.Efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer:A pooled analysis of three clinical trials[J].Eur J Cancer,2006,42(7):827-834.

二级参考文献32

共引文献53

同被引文献72

引证文献7

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部