期刊文献+

《世界华人消化杂志》开放获取的出版模式实现了临床医师和公众的利益最大化

Open-access publishing model for World Chinese Journal of Digestology achieves maximization of the benefits to readers,authors and the society
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《世界华人消化杂志》是一本全国性开放获取(open-access,OA)的学术类期刊.OA最大的优点是面向全国本领域专家及公众开放,无需注册,免费获取PDF等格式的全文,切实破除了传统性期刊阻碍科学研究成果快速传播的障碍.OA是一项真正意义上的公益性科学传播工具,实现了读者、作者和社会三个价值最大化的目标,努力推进本学科的繁荣和发展. World Chinese Journal of Digestology (WCJD) is a peer-reviewed,online,open-access (OA) journal.The biggest advantage of the OA model is that it provides free,full-text articles in PDF and other formats for experts and the public without registration,which eliminates the obstacle that traditional journals possess and usually delays the speed of the propagation and communication of scientific research results.The open-access model has been proven to be a true approach that may achieve the ultimate goal of the journal,i.e.,the maximization of the benefits to readers,authors and the society.
作者 王苑本
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第8期751-754,共4页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
关键词 世界华人消化杂志 开放获取 出版模式 价值最大化 World Chinese Journal of Digestology Open-access journal Publishing model Maximization
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

  • 1任胜利.开放存取(Open Access):现状与展望[J].中国科技期刊研究,2005,16(2):151-154. 被引量:112
  • 2李霞.科技期刊的电子出版及其对科技信息传播的影响[J].科学新闻,2007(8):11-11. 被引量:1
  • 3徐惠绵,陈峻青.胃类癌及其临床诊治[J].中国实用外科杂志,1997,17(3):135-137. 被引量:13
  • 4王苑本 刘振华.胃肠道类癌.肿瘤预后学,第1版[M].北京:北京科技文献出版社,1995.473-474.
  • 5Bocquet A. Alternatives for STM Publishing in the intemet age - Apersonal view. Presentation at Science writing seminar. National Natural Science Foundation. Beijing. July 17. 2004.
  • 6Riedesel H. Current trends in international STM publishing.Presentation at the First Forum on Scientific Publishing. China Association For Science & Technology. Beijing. Sept. 8. 2004.
  • 7Testa J. Journal selection process in a changing publishin genvironment. Talk presented at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.Beijing. Sept. 20. 2004.
  • 8Daniel Greenstein. Not so quiet on a Western front. University of California. 28 May 2004. http://www. nature. com/nature/focus/accessdebate/23. html [ 2004-09 -02 ].
  • 9Morris S. Open access and not-for-profit publishers. Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. 19 March 2004.http ://www. nature. com/nature/focus/accessdebate [ 2004-09 -02 ].
  • 10McCabe M J. Snyder C M. The best business model for scholarly journals: an economist's perspective. 16 July 2004. http://www.nature. com/nature/focusdaccessdebate/28. html [2004-09-02].

共引文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部