期刊文献+

黑芥与花椰菜体细胞杂种不同世代遗传变异的SRAP分析 被引量:2

Genetic Variation of the Different Offsprings Derived from Somatic Hybrids of Cauliflower and Black Mustard Revealed by SRAP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文利用SRAP标记对黑芥与花椰菜体细胞杂种回交一代到回交三代(BC1、BC2、BC3)及自交二代到自交四代(S2、S3、S4)的遗传变异进行了分析。20个引物组合共产生528条扩增带,其中多态性条带168条,平均每组引物产生8.4条多态性标记。结果表明,杂种后代各世代间都存在着不同程度的遗传变异,但变异的程度较小于预期值。在聚类图中,自交后代和回交后代被明显的区分成为两个类群。自交后代与黑芥的遗传距离较近,回交后代与花椰菜的遗传距离较近;自交后代的不同世代间变异程度要小于回交后代,但各世代间遗传距离的差异性并不显著(P>0.05)。 In this research, we analyzed the genetic variability of three selfing offsprings (S2, S3 and S4) and backcross offsprings (BC1, BC2 and BC3) of cauliflower-black mustard somatic hybrids by using sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers. A total of 528 bands were generated with 20 primer pairs, including 168 polymorphic bands with an average of 8.4 per primer combination. The results showed that the different offsprings of cauliflower-black mustard somatic hybrids had various degree of genetic variation, however, The extent of that was less than we expected. The offsprings of cauliflower-black mustard somatic hybrids were divided obviously into two parts of selfing offsprings and backcross offsprings in the cluster tree. The selfing offsprings had closer genetic distance to black mustard, The backcross offsprings had closer genetic distance to cauliflower. The hereditary variation degree of the selfing offsprings were less than that of backcross offsprings. But the offsprings of cauliflower-black mustard somatic hybrids had no significant difference in genetic distance (P0.05).
出处 《分子植物育种》 CAS CSCD 2010年第2期303-306,共4页 Molecular Plant Breeding
基金 国家自然科学基金(30771206) 国家863项目(2006AA100108) 北京市自然科学基金(5073045)共同资助
关键词 体细胞杂种 SRAP分析 遗传变异 Somatic hybrid SRAP analysis Genetic variation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

共引文献230

同被引文献28

  • 1余文贵,赵统敏,沈新莲,倪万潮.野生番茄单片段渐渗系的创建及应用[J].园艺学报,2006,33(1):197-202. 被引量:9
  • 2庞朝友,杜雄明,马峙英.棉属种间杂交基因渐渗系SSR标记及其表型性状的聚类分析[J].作物学报,2006,32(9):1371-1378. 被引量:24
  • 3Buell C R, Somerville S C. 1997. Use of Arabidopsis recombinant inbred lines reveals a monogenic and a novel digenic resistance mechanism to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. The Plant Journal, 12 (1): 21 - 29.
  • 4Donini P, Koebner R, Ceoloni C.1995. Cytogenetic and molecular mapping of the wheat - Aegilops longissima ehromatin breakpoints in powdery mildew-resistant introgression lines. Theor Appl Genet, 91 : 738 - 743.
  • 5Fargier E, Manceau C. 2007. Pathogenicity assays restrict the species Xanthomonas campestris into three pathovars and reveal nine races within X campestris pv. campestris. Plant Pathol, 56:805 - 818.
  • 6Flor H. 1971. Current statusofthegene-for-geneconcept. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 9:275 -296.
  • 7Guo H, Dickson M H, Hunter J E. 1991. Brassica napus sources of resistance to black rot in crucifers and inheritance of resistance. Hort Science, (26): 1545 - 1547.
  • 8Hayward A C. 1993. The host of Xanthomonas//Xanthomonas. London: Chapman & Hall: 51 - 54.
  • 9Hohmann U, Endo T R, Herrmann R G, Gill B S. 1995. Characterization of deletions in common wheat induced by an Aegilops cylindrica chromosome: detection of multiple chromosome rearrangements. TheorApplGenet, 91: 611-617.
  • 10Ignatov A., Kuginuki Y, Hidam K. 2002. Distribution and inheritance to of race-specific resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Brassica rapa and B. napus. J Russ Phytopathol Soe, (1): 89 - 94.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部