摘要
长期以来,国际法的渊源问题在学界难以得到一致的解释,但是相当一部分学者将国际法的渊源理解为国际法的表现形式。以这种理解作为前提,《国际法院规约》第38条只是国际法院的裁判依据,而非对国际法渊源的说明,但它的确为我们探究国际法渊源的范畴提供了一条线索。在对第38条所罗列的裁判依据和其他类别国际资料进行逐个分析和评论之后,现阶段国际法渊源的范畴应当是国际习惯和国际条约,且两者之间不存在等级关系。
For a long time, there is no unanimous explanation on the source of international law. But a large part of scholars consider it as the form of international law. Based on this understanding, it can be reached that the Article 38 of "Statute of the International Court of Justice" is just the basis of judicial judge rather than explanation of the source of international law while it does provide us with clues to the scope of the source of international law. After analysis of and comments on the items in and out of Article 38, it is concluded that the scope of the source of international law includes international convention and international custom, both of which are equal to each other as far as the legal power.
出处
《玉林师范学院学报》
2010年第1期99-103,118,共6页
Journal of Yulin Normal University
关键词
国际法
渊源
表现形式
范畴
《国际法院规约》第38条
international law
Source
form
scope
Article 38 of "Statute of the International Court of Justice"