期刊文献+

英语专业学生限时写作中的词汇问题解决策略研究 被引量:13

Lexical-Problem-Solving Strategies in L2 Timed Writing
原文传递
导出
摘要 本个案研究主要采用写作者有声思维和回顾访谈的方法,追踪和描述六名英语专业学生在限时写作过程中使用的各种词汇问题解决策略。研究发现,学生在写作中主要使用四类词汇策略群,包括费力提取、提升表达、避免问题和在线修正等。与年级水平差异有关的词汇策略行为主要表现在学生刚提取到一个词汇之际:高年级学生会进一步使用各种策略来提升词汇表达方式,从而寻找到语义精确、符合文体要求的合适词汇,并避免该词在上下文重复;而低年级学生则立即修正词汇形式。此外,在限时的写作任务中某些学生倾向于使用避免问题的策略,而不是努力检索合适的词汇。基于这些发现,本文就二语写作者解决词汇问题的思维路径和二语写作词汇能力的发展作了假设,以待后续研究。 The present case study, using thinkaloud and stimulated recalls, traces and describes six English majors' lexical-problem-solving strategies in the timed writing process. The study finds that students mainly employ four kinds of lexical strategies in English writing, including effortful-retrieval, lexical-upgrading, problem-avoidance and online form-repair. Proficiency difference between grades appears at the moment when students succeed in retrieving a lexical candidate: third-year students would then further employ strategies to fine-tune expressions so as to achieve lexical precision, stylistic appropriateness and avoid repetitive use of the word in the context, while first-year students would immediately employ strategies to repair lexical forms. In addition, it seems that in the timed writing task students may resort to problem-avoidance strategies instead of pursuing search for appropriate lexical use. Based on these findings, the study makes hypotheses concerning L2 writers' lexical-problem-solving paths and development of lexical competence in L2 writing. These hypotheses await further study.
作者 徐昉 丁言仁
机构地区 南京大学
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 2010年第2期54-62,111,共10页 Foreign Languages in China
关键词 二语写作 词汇策略 思维路径 词汇能力 L2 writing lexical strategies lexical-problem-solving paths lexical competence
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Beireiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. The Psychology of Written Composition [M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1987.
  • 2Cheng, X. & Steffensen, M. S. Metadiscourse A technique for improving student writing [J] Research in the Teaching of English, 1996 (30): 149-181.
  • 3Cohen, A. D. Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language [M]. Harlow, England: Longman, 1998.
  • 4Cohen, A. D. & Brooks-Carson, A. Research on direct versus translated writing: Students' strategies and their results [J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2001(85): 169-188.
  • 5Cumming, A. Writing expertise and second language proficiency [J]. Language Learning, 1989(39): 81-141.
  • 6Cumming, A. Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing [J]. Written Communication, 1990(7): 482-511.
  • 7Dornyei, Z. & Kormos, J. Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1998(20): 349-385.
  • 8Flower, L. & Hayes, J. R. A cognitive process theory of writing [J]. College Composition and Communication, 1981(32): 365-387.
  • 9Graham, S. & Harris, K. R. Self-regulation and writing: Where do we go from here? [J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1997 (22): 102-114.
  • 10Hall, C. Managing the complexity of revising across languages [J]. TESOL Quarterly, 1990 (24): 43-60.

二级参考文献12

  • 1马广惠.中美大学生英语作文语言特征的对比分析[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(5):45-49. 被引量:141
  • 2张淑静.中国英语专业学生make的使用特点调查报告[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2002,25(4):58-63. 被引量:82
  • 3Altenberg, B. & M. Tapper. 1998. The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners' written English [A]. In S. Granger (ed.). Learner English on Computer [C]. Pp. 80-93.
  • 4Cobb, T. 2002. Analyze late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replications of three European studies [J]. Canadian Modern Language Review (In press).
  • 5Granger, S (ed.). 1998. Learner English on Computer [C]. London & New York: Longman.
  • 6Lorenz, G. 1998. Overstatement in advanced learners'writing stylistic aspects of adjective intensification [A]. In S. Granger (ed.). Learner English on Computer [C]. Pp. 53-66.
  • 7Petch-Tyson, S. 1998. Writer/reader visibility in EFL written discourse [A]. In S. Granger ( ed. ).Learner English on Computer [C]. Pp. 107-118.
  • 8Reppen, R. 1994. Variation in elementary student language: A multi-dimensional perspective [D]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
  • 9Shaw, P. & E. Liu. 1998. What develops in the development of second-langnage writing? [J] Applied Linguistics 19: 225-254.
  • 10由于我们无法直接分析国际英语学者与本族语者的第一手语料.因此第一、第二个对比中只能根据文献中提供的分析结果.

共引文献483

同被引文献192

引证文献13

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部