期刊文献+

中学生图形推理认知特征诊断 被引量:3

THE DIAGNOSIS ON THE COGNITIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF FIGURE REASONING FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在前人的研究基础上进行口语报告分析,形成图形推理的认知成分模型。引进多策略多成分潜在特质模型(MLTM for MS)将图形推理的认知成分模型与心理测量模型加以整合,对235名中学生图形推理认知特征进行诊断。结果发现:(1)图形推理总能力相同的被试,各成分对应能力即视知觉识别能力、规则构建能力、规则应用能力不一定相同。(2)被试使用知觉分析策略和分析策略的正确作答概率较高,而使用猜测策略的正确作答概率较低。 The current study introduced MLTM for MS to have a diagnosis about cognitive characteristics of figure reasoning for middle school students. Eighteen participants were randomly selected to have oral report analysis on SPM. 235 middle students from five classes were selected with the random cluster sampling method with class as unit. The materials for figure reasoning were three tests adapted from SPM. The results suggest that 1) the corresponding ability of components may be different, although they had the same general ability for figure reasoning., and 2) , the correct response probability were quite high when subjects used perception analysis strategy and analysis strategy, but low with guess strategy.
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 2010年第1期7-11,共5页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
关键词 图形推理 认知诊断 多策略多成分潜在特质模型 figure reasoning, cognitive diagnosis, MLTM for MS.
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1林崇德,沃建中,陈浩莺.小学生图形推理策略发展特点的研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):2-8. 被引量:18
  • 2Hunt E. Quote the raven? Never more//Gregg L W. Knowledge and Psychological Measurement, 1974, 32:235-248.
  • 3Verguts T, Boeck P. The induction of solution rules in Raven's Progressive. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2002, 14 (4) : 521-547.
  • 4斯腾伯格.超越IQ-人类智力的三元理论.上海:华东师范大学出版社.2001.
  • 5Carpenter P A, Just M A, Shell P. What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychological Review, 1990, 4 (3) : 404-431.
  • 6Susan E E. Muhicomponent Latent Trait Models for Test design// Embretson S E. Test Design. Academic Press, 1985:196-217.
  • 7Achenbach T M. The children's association responding test: A possible alternative to group IQ tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970, 5:340-348.
  • 8Gentile J, Kessler K Gentil K. Process of solving analogies items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969, 60:494-502.
  • 9Embretson S. Psychometric Models for Learning and Cognitive Processes// Frederiksen N, Mislevy R J, Bejar I I. Test Theory for a New Generation of Tests. http://www.google.eom/books?hl= zh-CN&lr=-false.
  • 10Susan E. E. Multieomponent latent trait models for ability tests. Psychometric, 1980, 45:479-494.

二级参考文献24

  • 1张厚粲,孟庆茂,郑日昌.关于认知方式的实验研究——场依存性特征对学习和图形后效的影响[J].心理学报,1981,13(3):299-304. 被引量:50
  • 2杨治良,郭力平.认知风格的研究进展[J].心理科学,2001,24(3):326-329. 被引量:152
  • 3李寿欣,宋广文.关于高中生认知方式的测验研究[J].心理学报,1994,26(4):378-384. 被引量:39
  • 4张厚粲,王晓平.瑞文标准推理测验在我国的修订[J].心理学报,1989,21(2):113-121. 被引量:177
  • 5[1]Lemaire, P. And Siegler, R. S.. Four Aspects of Strategic Change: Contributions to Children' s Learning of Multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1995,124(1) :83-97
  • 6[2]Case, R.. The structure and process of intellectual development. International Journal of Psychology, 1987,22: 571-607
  • 7[3]Siegler,R. S.. Older ang Younger Adults'strategy Choices in Multiplication: Testing Predictions of ASCM Using the Choicc/No-Choice Method. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General. 1997,126( 1 ) :71-92
  • 8[4]Hunt, E.. Quote the revan? Never more. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.). Kn owledge and Psycholoical measurement, 1974,32: 235-248
  • 9[5]Carpenter, P. A. ,Just, M. A. & Shell, P. What one intelligence test measures:A theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychological Review, 1990,97(3) :404-431
  • 10[6]Seigler, R. S., Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill. Journal of experimental psychology:General. 1988,117:258-275

共引文献54

同被引文献42

  • 1毕鸿燕,彭聃龄,于海霞.儿童的直接推理能力及策略的发展[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):558-562. 被引量:7
  • 2林崇德,沃建中,陈浩莺.小学生图形推理策略发展特点的研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):2-8. 被引量:18
  • 3雷范军.人教版高中化学新教科书中数据类图表初探[J].现代中小学教育,2006,22(5):24-26. 被引量:4
  • 4Steinberg.(1999).超越IQ—人类智力的三元理论.上海.华东师范大学出版社.
  • 5Andersen, E. B. (1985). Estimating latent correlations between repeated testings. Psychomeadk, 50, 3-16.
  • 6Campbell. C., & Carlson. J. S. (1995). The dynamic assessment of mental abiliges, J.S.Carlson(Eds.) Advances in cognition and educational practice: Eruopean contributions to dynamic assessment. JAIPress Inc. 3,1-31.
  • 7Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures:A theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test.Psychologlcal Review, 4(3),404-413.
  • 8Daly, J. J. (1997). Idcntigcation of cognitive processes in a fluid intelligence measure and response by older adults to targeted trffning. Unpublicshed doctorial dissertation, The Graduate Faculty of the University of Akron.
  • 9DiBeUo. L.V, Roussos. L. A. & william S. (2007). Review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models. Handbook of Statlstics, 26, 979-1030.
  • 10Embretson, S. E. (1991). A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change. Psychometdka, 56(3) 495-515.

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部