期刊文献+

压疮危险因素评估的研究进展 被引量:7

The progress on risk assessment for pressure ulcer
原文传递
导出
摘要 压疮危险因素的准确评估是制定有效预防和治疗策略最为至关重要的一步,目前临床应用的各种压疮危险因素评估表中的各个参数赋予相等的权重、总评分只是各参数计分的算术和,评判过于简单、主观性过强。压疮危险因素评估的发展趋势是由经过正规训练、经验丰富的护士对患者进行评估,并应用计算机压力监测装置、皮肤血流激光多普勒,同时将不同权重记分法与先进的统计技术相结合研发出更确切的数据驱动的RASs系统。 The accurate risk -assessment scales (RASs) is considerable for instituting strategy for prevention and management of pressure ulcers (PU) . In the current, the values achieved within each risk factor are summed to derive the total score. The equal -weigh- ring scoring technique is too simplistic and subjective leads to limitations. It shows that properly trained, experienced nurses should conduct PU risk assessments, whilst more robust data - driven PASs should be developed using the computation pressure monitoring, skin blood flow laser - Doppler and differential weighting scoring method together with advanced statistical techniques.
出处 《国际护理学杂志》 2010年第2期163-165,共3页 international journal of nursing
关键词 压疮 病因 危险因素 评估 Pressure ulcer Etiopathogenisis Risk - assessment scales
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Black .I, Baharestani M, Cuddigan J, et al. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panels updated pressure ulcer staging system [J]. Urol Nuts, 2007, 27 (2): 144-156.
  • 2Thomas DR. Issues and dilemmas in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a review [J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2001, 56 (6) : 328 -340.
  • 3ONeil CK, Pham D. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers[J]. J Phar Practice, 2004, 17 (2) : 137 - 148.
  • 4Bennett R.G, O'Sullivan J, DeVito EM, et al. The increasing medical malpractice risk related to pressure ulcers in the United States[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2000, 48 (1): 73-81.
  • 5Margolis DJ, Knauss J, Bilker W, et al. Medical conditions as risk factors for pressure ulcers in an outpatient setting [J].May, 2003, 32 (3) : 259 -264.
  • 6Gray M, Bohacek L, Weir D, et al. Moisture vs pressure: making sense out of perineal wounds [J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nuts, 2007, 34 (2): 134-142.
  • 7Balzer K, Pohl C, Dassen T, et al.The Norton, Waterlow, Braden, and Care Dependency Scales: eomparing their validity when identifying patients' pressure sore risk [J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2007, 34 (4): 389-398.
  • 8Kelly J. Inter - rater reliability and Waterlow's pressure ulcer risk assess- ment tool [J]. Nurs Stand, 2005, 19 (32) : 86.
  • 9Anthony D, Reynolds T, Russell L A regression analysis of the Water- low score in pressure ulcer risk assessment [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2003, 17 (2): 216-223.
  • 10Braden B J, Maklebust J. Preventing pressure ulcers with the Braden scale: an update on this easy - to - use tool that assesses a patient's risk [J].Am J Nurs, 2005, 105 (6): 70-72.

同被引文献51

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部