摘要
目的探讨药物(呋嘛滴鼻液与复方薄荷油滴鼻液)滴鼻与雾化吸入对胃肠减压病人舒适度的影响。方法采用调查统计表的形式,回顾性分析105例胃肠减压病人在药物滴鼻与雾化吸入两种护理干预下临床上所表现的各种不适情况,并进行统计学处理。结果呋嘛滴鼻液与复方薄荷油滴鼻液交替滴鼻在缓解胃肠减压病人咽喉吞咽疼痛、语言表达受限、头颈活动受限及口咽并发症等方面,较雾化吸入相比存在明显差异(P〈0.05或P〈0.01);在口咽干燥、咳嗽、咯痰、难以耐受、恶心、呕吐等不适方面,两组护理干预对比研究无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但药物滴鼻组的所有术后不适统计指标的构成比均低于雾化吸入组。结论呋嘛滴鼻液与复方薄荷油滴鼻液交替滴鼻,在缓解短期(术后7d内)胃肠减压病人术后出现的各种不适方面具有明显的临床疗效。
Objective To probe into the influence of atomized medicine sucking and medicine dripping on the comfort degree of the patients who received gastrointestinal decompression. Methods Satistic forms for investigation were used to analyze various clinical unpleasant phenomena of 105 patients reeeiving gastrointestinal decompression under medicines dripping and atomized medicines sueking, and the data were analyzed statistically. Results In respect of alleviating the patients throat pain when swallowed, restriction of language expression, restriction of head and neck activity, mouth and throat complication etc, alternatively dripping ephedrine hydrochloride and nitrofurazone nasal drops and peppermint oil mixture was quite different from sucking atomized medicines ( P 〈 0. 05 or P 〈 0. 01 ) ; while in respect of month and throat's insipidity, coughing out phlegm, unbearability, vomiting etc, there was no statistic difference between the two groups of nursing interventions (P 〉0. 05) . However, medicines dripping group was much lower than atomized medicines sucking group in composing proportion of all statistic. Conclusions Alternatively dripping ephedrine hydroehloride and nitrofurazone nasal drops and peppermint and nitrofurazone nasal drops and peppermint oil mixture have obvious eurative effect on alleviating all kinds of the unpleasant phenomena appearing in those short - term patients after operation ( in 7 d) .
出处
《国际护理学杂志》
2010年第2期184-186,共3页
international journal of nursing
关键词
药物滴鼻
雾化吸入
胃肠减压
舒适度
Atomized medicines sucking
Medicine dripping gastrointestinal decompression
Comfort degree